New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PowerDNS Recursor 4.0.9 #7152

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Nov 6, 2018

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@aerique
Member

aerique commented Nov 6, 2018

No description provided.

rgacogne added some commits May 23, 2018

Allocate DNSRecord objects as smart pointers right away
(cherry picked from commit 1339125af5afe6d6ecfe0a500c5fdc76d790459d)
(cherry picked from commit 79c712a3b7a436a0f1bd238e5c3f26df5c55c364)
rec: Refuse queries for rfc6895 section 3.1 meta types
(cherry picked from commit ab1b5574d15a62e67a133828fc98502de830842c)
(cherry picked from commit 834b326fb0ebda4622360a0e0c40888e6dceb946)
rec: Keep the EDNS status of a server on FormErr with EDNS
Note that the choice of DNAME in the unit test is an arbitrary
choice, we could even have used A here.

(cherry picked from commit 6fb756b6cd49d61eacf7865ce48d0edb62730710)
(cherry picked from commit e8cc6a136087c5ede35f55b3a67902dcb0030165)

@aerique aerique added this to the rec-4.0.x milestone Nov 6, 2018

@aerique aerique self-assigned this Nov 6, 2018

@aerique aerique requested review from Habbie, pieterlexis and rgacogne Nov 6, 2018

@rgacogne

This comment has been minimized.

Member

rgacogne commented Nov 6, 2018

LGTM failure is because it's trying to analyse code for the auth in the rec-4.0.x branch, where the auth is not in great shape.

@aerique aerique merged commit 8fca8ec into PowerDNS:rel/rec-4.0.x Nov 6, 2018

3 of 4 checks passed

LGTM analysis: C/C++ Analysis failed (could not build the base commit (e856ae0))
Details
LGTM analysis: JavaScript No code changes detected
Details
LGTM analysis: Python No code changes detected
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment