Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rec-4.1.x: Backport of 7714: Fix DNSSEC validation of wildcards expanded onto themselves #7816

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 14, 2019
Merged

rec-4.1.x: Backport of 7714: Fix DNSSEC validation of wildcards expanded onto themselves #7816

merged 3 commits into from May 14, 2019

Conversation

rgacogne
Copy link
Member

Short description

Backport of #7714 to rel/rec-4.1.x.

Checklist

I have:

  • read the CONTRIBUTING.md document
  • compiled this code
  • tested this code
  • included documentation (including possible behaviour changes)
  • documented the code
  • added or modified regression test(s)
  • added or modified unit test(s)
  • checked that this code was merged to master

@rgacogne rgacogne added this to the rec-4.1.x milestone May 13, 2019
@omoerbeek omoerbeek self-requested a review May 14, 2019 13:45
omoerbeek
omoerbeek reviewed May 14, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@omoerbeek omoerbeek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Compared this backport to master and all pieces are there. I lack the specific knowledge to validate the DNSSEC changes, though.

@rgacogne rgacogne merged commit 8515725 into PowerDNS:rel/rec-4.1.x May 14, 2019
@rgacogne rgacogne deleted the rec41-backport-7714 branch May 14, 2019 14:18
@aerique aerique modified the milestones: rec-4.1.x, rec-4.1.13 May 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@omoerbeek omoerbeek omoerbeek left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
defect rec
Projects
None yet
Milestone
rec-4.1.13
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@rgacogne @omoerbeek @aerique