DscResources: Added submodule NetworkingDsc, and xDisk

[johlju]

• Changes to DscResources
  • Added deprecated resource module xDisk for reference.
  • Added renamed resource module NetworkingDsc, and removing old xNetworking.
  • Renamed xNetworking to NetworkingDsc in all related documents.
  • Minor updates to integration tests template.
  • Switched examples in TestGuidelines because the previous resource
    tests had gotten too complex for an easy example.

---

This change is 

[johlju]

@PlagueHO Do you mind reviewing this one too when you have a chance? VS Code trimmed a lot of white spaces, so it's look bigger than it is.

[PlagueHO]

Sweet as @johlju . I'll get on to this and the other ones tomorrow!

[PlagueHO]

Everything looks good, but just a question about whether or not we should still include deprecated resources as submodules?

---

Reviewed 10 of 10 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.

---

.gitmodules, line 196 at r1 (raw file):

	path = DscResources/ActiveDirectoryCSDsc
	url = https://github.com/PowerShell/ActiveDirectoryCSDsc
[submodule "xDscResources/xDisk"]

Should this resource still be linked as a submodule if it is deprecated? Same goes for xTimezone.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[johlju]

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

---

.gitmodules, line 196 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, PlagueHO (Daniel Scott-Raynsford) wrote…

Should this resource still be linked as a submodule if it is deprecated? Same goes for xTimezone.

I understand your point. This repo was linked to the Waffle board. I thought is since they is a part of DSC Resource Kit we keep the linked here too so they don't float around without an "owner". I personally rather see these deprecated repos removed entirely later on, and then we can remove and references to them.
We are also discussing the use of submodules in it's entirely, haven't had time posting an issue about that yet (I will make sure to do that next week). I suggest keeping these as submodules for the time being.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[johlju]

@PlagueHO Do you have time to sign-off on this one unless you have another argument for us leaving out xDisk? 🙂

[PlagueHO]

Doh! Sorry I missed this @johlju - I'll sign it off first thing tomorrow (only on my phone atm)

[PlagueHO]

---

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.

---

Comments from Reviewable