[*] FO : Searching multiple keywords as OR instead of AND #1277

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@IceEyz

IceEyz commented Jan 21, 2014

Searching for multiple keywords was always assumed as AND. Now, it is assumed as OR. Products with both keywords are positioned high by the existing score system. The array definition and intersect have been moved out of the loop.

[*] FO : Searching multiple keywords as OR instead of AND
Searching for multiple keywords was always assumed as AND. Now, it is assumed as OR. Products with both keywords are positioned high by the existing score system.
@vTerenti

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@vTerenti

vTerenti Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

(note: this is an automated message, but answering it will reach a real human )

Hi! Thank you for your pull request: your contribution to PrestaShop means a lot to us!

We are aware that this PR is still open after all this time, and we want to make sure that your hard work is not forgotten.

We are diving back into pull requests, and we want to work with you in order to get your PR to completion: we need your feedback!

Could you read this article from the Build devblog, and take the time to review your pull requests, so that we can work with up-to-date information? You don't have to do it all right now, and every little step helps.

Again, thank you very much for this contribution, and for your renewed feedback on it!

Contributor

vTerenti commented Nov 5, 2015

(note: this is an automated message, but answering it will reach a real human )

Hi! Thank you for your pull request: your contribution to PrestaShop means a lot to us!

We are aware that this PR is still open after all this time, and we want to make sure that your hard work is not forgotten.

We are diving back into pull requests, and we want to work with you in order to get your PR to completion: we need your feedback!

Could you read this article from the Build devblog, and take the time to review your pull requests, so that we can work with up-to-date information? You don't have to do it all right now, and every little step helps.

Again, thank you very much for this contribution, and for your renewed feedback on it!

@vTerenti

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@vTerenti

vTerenti Jun 28, 2016

Contributor

Hello!

This PR has been automatically closed because the branch 1.6 does not exist anymore.

Best regards

Contributor

vTerenti commented Jun 28, 2016

Hello!

This PR has been automatically closed because the branch 1.6 does not exist anymore.

Best regards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment