Fix custom loss layer documentation #120
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportBase: 73.74% // Head: 73.74% // No change to project coverage 👍
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #120 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 73.74% 73.74%
=======================================
Files 14 14
Lines 2609 2609
=======================================
Hits 1924 1924
Misses 685 685 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As brought up in this thread, the example from the docs was incomplete, missing methods for the
targetfunction and one for selecting the loss for a given epoch (that is my understanding anyway). This was added, along with some spelling and grammar changes as well.