Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove loglevel config from module #98

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 29, 2015
Merged

remove loglevel config from module #98

merged 1 commit into from Jan 29, 2015

Conversation

@cpdean
Copy link
Contributor

@cpdean cpdean commented Jan 29, 2015

by always setting the log level, you enforce that log level on every
project that attempts to depend on the pep257 module. instead logging
should be enabled for debug when needed.

this fixes a bug in the flake8-docstrings plugin for flake8

by always setting the log level, you enforce that log level on every
project that attempts to depend on the pep257 module.  instead logging
should be enabled for debug when needed.

this fixes a bug in the flake8-docstrings plugin for flake8
Nurdok added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2015
remove loglevel config from module
@Nurdok Nurdok merged commit a5aa2e2 into PyCQA:master Jan 29, 2015
1 check passed
Loading
@Nurdok
Copy link
Member

@Nurdok Nurdok commented Jan 29, 2015

Thanks @cpdean !

Loading

@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Member

@sigmavirus24 sigmavirus24 commented Mar 9, 2015

@Nurdok has a version with this included been released?

Loading

@Nurdok
Copy link
Member

@Nurdok Nurdok commented Mar 10, 2015

Hey @sigmavirus24, sorry for taking so long. This was merged on Jan 29th, but the latest version (0.4.1) was released in Jan 10th, so this PR was not included.

Loading

@Nurdok
Copy link
Member

@Nurdok Nurdok commented Mar 10, 2015

You can see this information in our new and fancy docs!
http://pep257.readthedocs.org/en/latest/release_notes.html

Loading

@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Member

@sigmavirus24 sigmavirus24 commented Mar 12, 2015

@Nurdok any chance of an 0.4.2?

Loading

@Nurdok
Copy link
Member

@Nurdok Nurdok commented Mar 12, 2015

Sure, it might take me a couple of days, though.
On Mar 12, 2015 4:05 AM, "Ian Cordasco" notifications@github.com wrote:

@Nurdok https://github.com/Nurdok any chance of an 0.4.2?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#98 (comment).

Loading

@Nurdok Nurdok added this to the Next Release milestone Mar 14, 2015
@Nurdok Nurdok added this to the Next Release milestone Mar 14, 2015
@Nurdok
Copy link
Member

@Nurdok Nurdok commented Mar 14, 2015

Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants