Skip to content

Docs: Fix Terminology in Resource / Labware Comparison #716

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2025
Merged

Docs: Fix Terminology in Resource / Labware Comparison #716

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/resources/index.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ PLR's `Resource` subclasses in the inheritance tree are:
However, in our discussions, it became evident that the term "labware" has different meanings to different stakeholders
(e.g., "A plate is clearly labware, but is a liquid handler or a plate reader labware?").
As a result, PLR avoids the ambiguous term "labware".</p>
<p><u>Every physical item (describable via its <code>item_x</code>, <code>item_y</code>, <code>item_z</code>) is a "resource"</u>.</p>
<p><u>Every physical item (describable by its physical dimensions <code>size_x</code>, <code>size_y</code>, <code>size_z</code>) is a `Resource`</u>.</p>
</details>

<hr>
Expand Down