Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upTails does not boot in Qubes HVM #1343
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
marmarek
Oct 17, 2015
Member
I guess it's about ancient qemu we have in stub domain. Unfortunately
newer version (aka "qemu upstream") requires major stub domain rework,
which hadn't been done yet (but was planned since AFAIR Xen 4.4). Eric
Shelton tried to encourage Xen people to work on it, also providing some
help there. But as for today, Xen 4.6 still doesn't support qemu
upstream in stub domain.
Anyway this problem probably can be fixed by Tails by some Xorg
configuration (or adding another driver). Not sure if worth reporting,
what is the Tails statement about using it in VM?
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
|
I guess it's about ancient qemu we have in stub domain. Unfortunately Anyway this problem probably can be fixed by Tails by some Xorg Best Regards, |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
adrelanos
Oct 17, 2015
Member
what is the Tails statement about using it in VM?
https://tails.boum.org/doc/advanced_topics/virtualization/index.de.html
https://tails.boum.org/doc/advanced_topics/virtualization/index.de.html |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
unman
Oct 18, 2015
Member
@adrelanos
Explicitly setting vga mode at boot should fix this.
Try appending vga=792
|
@adrelanos |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
That workaround works. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
adrelanos
Oct 18, 2015
Member
Booted with smaller resolution, vga=788. But that workaround still leaves one with an unusable Tails. It boots up until the graphical target just fine. The problem is, that the bottom side of the window reaches below dom0's taskbar. So for example the "ok" button in Tails launcher outside the visible monitor area.
|
Booted with smaller resolution, |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
adrelanos
Oct 18, 2015
Member
Existing general Qubes OS ticket at Tails redmine tracker,
Try running Tails inside of Qubes OS:
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/8607
Reported this issue on the tails-dev mailing list,
[Tails-dev] Tails fails to run inside Qubes OS:
https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2015-October/009628.html
|
Existing general Qubes OS ticket at Tails redmine tracker, Reported this issue on the tails-dev mailing list, |
marmarek
added
C: other
C: doc
labels
Jan 7, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
marmarek
Jan 7, 2016
Member
Not sure how to classify this? Should we have some documentation "how to run Tails in Qubes HVM"?
|
Not sure how to classify this? Should we have some documentation "how to run Tails in Qubes HVM"? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
DrWhax
Jan 7, 2016
I was just trying this out! What a coincidence! On my R3.0 with the vga=788 option, I just get a blank screen and nothing happens. This was with a Tails 1.8.1 release.
Ideally, we should test out the 2.0 beta release that is next on my list of things to do. Hopefully things have improved on Debian Jessie's side, it's slightly more positive from what I understand from the tails-dev mailinglist.
But yes, if we figure out what works with what version, we should create documentation for it!
DrWhax
commented
Jan 7, 2016
|
I was just trying this out! What a coincidence! On my R3.0 with the vga=788 option, I just get a blank screen and nothing happens. This was with a Tails 1.8.1 release. Ideally, we should test out the 2.0 beta release that is next on my list of things to do. Hopefully things have improved on Debian Jessie's side, it's slightly more positive from what I understand from the tails-dev mailinglist. But yes, if we figure out what works with what version, we should create documentation for it! |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
adrelanos
Jan 7, 2016
Member
Documenting it isn't possible as no one has figured out yet how to get
it into a usable state.
As per what you wrote in
#1343 (comment)
it's a Xen issue. One you probably won't have priority/time to fix. Not
sure what's best to do with such kind of tickets. It's an outstanding
issue, good to know, not really fixed, good if found through search
engines. I would leave it open with "patches welcome". Or close it if
that works better with your issue tracker customs.
|
Documenting it isn't possible as no one has figured out yet how to get As per what you wrote in |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
adrelanos
Jan 7, 2016
Member
Seems like @DrWhax and me posted in the exact same minute. This somewhat obsoletes my previous post. Since someone is working on it, perhaps best to leave it open.
|
Seems like @DrWhax and me posted in the exact same minute. This somewhat obsoletes my previous post. Since someone is working on it, perhaps best to leave it open. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
DrWhax
Jan 7, 2016
Well, both the beta of 2.0 and a latest stable release (1.8.1) both don't load, all I get is a black screen. Fiddling with the vga line doesn't do anything to circumvent the issue. I guess we should document that it doesn't work? :)
DrWhax
commented
Jan 7, 2016
|
Well, both the beta of 2.0 and a latest stable release (1.8.1) both don't load, all I get is a black screen. Fiddling with the vga line doesn't do anything to circumvent the issue. I guess we should document that it doesn't work? :) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
austin987
Jan 7, 2016
@marmarek / @adrelanos what Xen issue? What Xorg driver is needed? Tails is based on Debian, if it's only a missing driver this should be trivial to fix on Tails' end.
austin987
commented
Jan 7, 2016
|
@marmarek / @adrelanos what Xen issue? What Xorg driver is needed? Tails is based on Debian, if it's only a missing driver this should be trivial to fix on Tails' end. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
austin987
Jan 7, 2016
Yes, I saw that. I was hoping for a Xen bug # or link, and/or the name of the missing Xorg driver, if known.
austin987
commented
Jan 7, 2016
|
Yes, I saw that. I was hoping for a Xen bug # or link, and/or the name of the missing Xorg driver, if known. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
DrWhax
Jan 7, 2016
Indeed, this would allow us to build an iso and test again. Any pointer is welcome.
DrWhax
commented
Jan 7, 2016
|
Indeed, this would allow us to build an iso and test again. Any pointer is welcome. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
marmarek
Jan 7, 2016
Member
Does Tails use "quiet" kernel boot option? If so, remove and see kernel
messages. Or maybe it fails at X server load time? Having some way to
extract X server log would be useful...
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
|
Does Tails use "quiet" kernel boot option? If so, remove and see kernel Best Regards, |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
DrWhax
Jan 8, 2016
I just did this with an Tails 2.0~beta1 iso and I get this:
"Probing EDD (edd=off to disable) OK" and then it just hangs.
DrWhax
commented
Jan 8, 2016
|
I just did this with an Tails 2.0~beta1 iso and I get this: "Probing EDD (edd=off to disable) OK" and then it just hangs. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
austin987
Jan 8, 2016
@marmarek, yes, it's quiet by default.
I've never used Qubes myself (on my list of things to try soon), is https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/live-usb/ still valid? That would make testing easier for me.
austin987
commented
Jan 8, 2016
|
@marmarek, yes, it's quiet by default. I've never used Qubes myself (on my list of things to try soon), is https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/live-usb/ still valid? That would make testing easier for me. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
adrelanos
Jan 8, 2016
Member
Austin English:
I've never used Qubes myself (on my list of things to try soon), is https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/live-usb/ still valid? That would make testing easier for me.
Please don't hijack random tickets for unrelated discussion. No offense
intended. Just trying to keep the overview.
|
Austin English:
Please don't hijack random tickets for unrelated discussion. No offense |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
mfc
May 10, 2016
Member
just to keep this thread updated, there is online documentation on running Tails in Qubes HVM now: https://garlicgambit.wordpress.com/2016/04/22/how-to-run-tails-from-a-qubes-live-cd and #1969.
|
just to keep this thread updated, there is online documentation on running Tails in Qubes HVM now: https://garlicgambit.wordpress.com/2016/04/22/how-to-run-tails-from-a-qubes-live-cd and #1969. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
andrewdavidwong
May 10, 2016
Member
I'm amazed #1343 is still open: it was only ever a display problem, for which I gave solution. It's not an issue now.
@adrelanos, @marmarek: Can we close this?
@adrelanos, @marmarek: Can we close this? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
@DrWhax can you test and confirm please? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
mfc
May 20, 2016
Member
this ticket should shift towards documenting how to do it -- running Tails within an installed instance of Qubes will have slightly different (and shorter) documentation than garlicgambit's documentation, and is vastly more useful since Qubes Live USB is not maintained.
|
this ticket should shift towards documenting how to do it -- running Tails within an installed instance of Qubes will have slightly different (and shorter) documentation than garlicgambit's documentation, and is vastly more useful since Qubes Live USB is not maintained. |
mfc
added this to the
Documentation/website milestone
May 20, 2016
mfc
added
C: website
privacy
and removed
C: other
labels
May 20, 2016
added a commit
to unman/qubes-doc
that referenced
this issue
May 31, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
adrelanos
May 31, 2016
Member
Since QubesOS/qubes-doc#154 by @unman was merged, I guess this ticket can be closed.
(For the record: this does not give us amnesic / anti-forensics / Tails-like functionality in Qubes. That is #2024.)
|
Since QubesOS/qubes-doc#154 by @unman was merged, I guess this ticket can be closed. (For the record: this does not give us amnesic / anti-forensics / Tails-like functionality in Qubes. That is #2024.) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
great, closed. |
adrelanos commentedOct 17, 2015
I've downloaded Tails 1.6. Stored in my iso-download (debian-8 based) AppVM. Then followed the https://www.qubes-os.org/en/doc/hvm-create/ instructions.
Initially Tails boots. You can see the Tails boot menu. Whatever you choose, the default option or failsafe, same result. Where it hangs is a black screen only showing
_.It doesn't bother me personally too much. It's very low on my wishlist. So is this worth of being reported? I am just wondering if there could be a more general underlying issue that would be worth fixing.