hardening Whonix update/upgrade design inside Qubes

[TNTBOMBOM]

from this design:-

to this design:-

and i think its obvious for reasoning why it has more security and even useability at the same time.

[mfc]

apologies but the diagrams are actually not that illuminating, it might be better to write out your ideas?

1. whonix-gw should be a proxyvm not an appvm
2. you seem to be suggesting... standalone VMs for the whonix-gw and -ws rather than templates?

please pitch these ideas to the mailing lists or whonix forums first to get feedback, thanks!

[mfc]

apologies but the diagrams are actually not that illuminating, it might be better to write out your ideas?

1. whonix-gw should be a proxyvm not an appvm
2. you seem to be suggesting... standalone VMs for the whonix-gw and -ws rather than templates?

please pitch these ideas to the mailing lists or whonix forums first to get feedback, thanks!

[TNTBOMBOM]

apologies but the diagrams are actually not that illuminating, it might be better to write out your ideas?

already did that:-
https://forums.whonix.org/t/upgrading-the-update-upgrade-mechanism-of-whonix-templates/1933

1. whonix-gw should be a proxyvm not an appvm

yeah , but meant by the appVM the GW/WS they will be based on a template whonix (the normal situation) , or they r not a sudoers/standalone VMs.

1. you seem to be suggesting... standalone VMs for the whonix-gw and -ws rather than templates?

nope.

please pitch these ideas to the mailing lists

to be honest with u , i hate google groups and i hope i dont need to use it in the future. because i hate google.

[TNTBOMBOM]

apologies but the diagrams are actually not that illuminating, it might be better to write out your ideas?

already did that:-
https://forums.whonix.org/t/upgrading-the-update-upgrade-mechanism-of-whonix-templates/1933

1. whonix-gw should be a proxyvm not an appvm

yeah , but meant by the appVM the GW/WS they will be based on a template whonix (the normal situation) , or they r not a sudoers/standalone VMs.

1. you seem to be suggesting... standalone VMs for the whonix-gw and -ws rather than templates?

nope.

please pitch these ideas to the mailing lists

to be honest with u , i hate google groups and i hope i dont need to use it in the future. because i hate google.

[marmarek]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 05:55:31AM -0800, TNT BOM BOM wrote:

please pitch these ideas to the mailing lists

to be honest with u , i hate the google groups and i hope i dont need to use it in the future. because i hate google.

You can use whatever email client you want. I use mutt for example.

Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

[marmarek]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 05:55:31AM -0800, TNT BOM BOM wrote:

please pitch these ideas to the mailing lists

to be honest with u , i hate the google groups and i hope i dont need to use it in the future. because i hate google.

You can use whatever email client you want. I use mutt for example.

Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

[TNTBOMBOM]

aha ok , i will fix the design then (from appvm to proxyvm) and re-upload the photos but witha mailing list.

thnx (f)

I use mutt for example.

i just want to tell u : damn how old and gold u r dude.

[TNTBOMBOM]

aha ok , i will fix the design then (from appvm to proxyvm) and re-upload the photos but witha mailing list.

thnx (f)

I use mutt for example.

i just want to tell u : damn how old and gold u r dude.