Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up4.0rc1 default dvm removal causes many issues #3128
Comments
marmarek
self-assigned this
Sep 27, 2017
marmarek
added
bug
C: core
P: major
labels
Sep 27, 2017
marmarek
added this to the Release 4.0 milestone
Sep 27, 2017
added a commit
to marmarek/qubes-core-admin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2017
marmarek
referenced this issue
in QubesOS/qubes-core-admin
Sep 29, 2017
Merged
Various fixes and improvements #153
marmarek
closed this
in
QubesOS/qubes-core-admin#153
Oct 3, 2017
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
qubesos-bot
Oct 7, 2017
Automated announcement from builder-github
The package qubes-core-dom0-4.0.8-1.fc25 has been pushed to the r4.0 testing repository for dom0.
To test this update, please install it with the following command:
sudo qubes-dom0-update --enablerepo=qubes-dom0-current-testing
qubesos-bot
commented
Oct 7, 2017
|
Automated announcement from builder-github The package
|
qubesos-bot
added
the
r4.0-dom0-cur-test
label
Oct 7, 2017
qubesos-bot
referenced this issue
in QubesOS/updates-status
Oct 7, 2017
Closed
core-admin v4.0.8 (r4.0) #250
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
qubesos-bot
Oct 30, 2017
Automated announcement from builder-github
The package qubes-core-dom0-4.0.11-1.fc25 has been pushed to the r4.0 stable repository for dom0.
To install this update, please use the standard update command:
sudo qubes-dom0-update
Or update dom0 via Qubes Manager.
qubesos-bot
commented
Oct 30, 2017
|
Automated announcement from builder-github The package
Or update dom0 via Qubes Manager. |
3hhh commentedSep 27, 2017
Qubes OS version (e.g.,
R3.2):4.0rc1
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
qvm-removeto delete the default dvm (seequbes-prefs)qvm-ls,qubes-prefs,qvm-prefs, ... They will all show some strange Python error messages which are not helpful at all. Apparently they all expect a dispvm to exist which isn't there anymoreExpected behavior:
Either
qvm-removeshould check that it's not deleting anything essential orqvm-ls& Co should have some fallback mechanism (qvm-lscould e.g. show that the template doesn't exist anymore).