New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Qubes R4 qvm-run --all regression (starts all VMs) (blocking rather than non-blocking) #3162

Closed
adrelanos opened this Issue Oct 9, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@adrelanos
Member

adrelanos commented Oct 9, 2017

Qubes OS version (e.g., R3.2):

Qubes R4 RC1 with all stable upgrades

Affected TemplateVMs (e.g., fedora-23, if applicable):

dom0


Steps to reproduce the behavior:

qvm-run --all "sudo poweroff"

(This was useful in Qubes R2 to work around various reboot/shutdown related hickups. (Shutdown never completing.))

Expected behavior:

Like in Qubes R3.2. The command only being run in VMs currently being running. Not starting all VMs to run the command.

Non-blocking. Running that command on all VMs at once.

Actual behavior:

Starts all VMs.

Blocking. Runs the command in first VM, goes on the next one. Very slow process. No longer useful.

@adrelanos adrelanos changed the title from Qubes R4 qvm-run --all regression (starts all VMs) to Qubes R4 qvm-run --all regression (starts all VMs) (blocking rather than non-blocing) Oct 9, 2017

@adrelanos adrelanos changed the title from Qubes R4 qvm-run --all regression (starts all VMs) (blocking rather than non-blocing) to Qubes R4 qvm-run --all regression (starts all VMs) (blocking rather than non-blocking) Oct 9, 2017

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Oct 9, 2017

Member

This should be fixed in qubes-core-admin-client 4.0.5, what version do you have?

Member

marmarek commented Oct 9, 2017

This should be fixed in qubes-core-admin-client 4.0.5, what version do you have?

@3hhh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment

3hhh commented Oct 13, 2017

Related: #3083

@marmarek marmarek closed this Oct 19, 2017

@adrelanos

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@adrelanos

adrelanos Oct 19, 2017

Member
Member

adrelanos commented Oct 19, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment