New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gnome-control-center crashes on fedora-26 template #3635

Closed
rootkovska opened this Issue Feb 26, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@rootkovska
Member

rootkovska commented Feb 26, 2018

With all the latest updates installed.

[user@fedora-26 ~]$ gnome-control-center 
libEGL warning: DRI2: failed to authenticate
libEGL warning: DRI2: failed to open swrast (search paths /usr/lib64/dri)
libEGL warning: DRI2: failed to authenticate
libEGL warning: DRI2: failed to open swrast (search paths /usr/lib64/dri)

(gnome-control-center:30621): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_strsplit: assertion 'string != NULL' failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: failed to authenticate
libEGL warning: DRI2: failed to open swrast (search paths /usr/lib64/dri)

(gnome-control-center:30621): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_strsplit: assertion 'string != NULL' failed

(gnome-control-center:30621): Clutter-CRITICAL **: Unable to initialize Clutter: Unable to initialize the Clutter backend: no available drivers found.
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Feb 27, 2018

Member

Look like gnome-control-center Fedora package lack dependency it apparently require: mesa-dri-drivers. I'll add to template independently...

Member

marmarek commented Feb 27, 2018

Look like gnome-control-center Fedora package lack dependency it apparently require: mesa-dri-drivers. I'll add to template independently...

@marmarek marmarek self-assigned this Feb 27, 2018

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Feb 27, 2018

Member

@rootkovska unless you want to do full template reinstall, you need to install this package manually.

Member

marmarek commented Feb 27, 2018

@rootkovska unless you want to do full template reinstall, you need to install this package manually.

@rootkovska

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rootkovska

rootkovska Feb 27, 2018

Member

While at it, can you also make the git autocompletion work again in the fedora template? After switching to 4.0rc4 this stopped working for me in all my VMs.

Member

rootkovska commented Feb 27, 2018

While at it, can you also make the git autocompletion work again in the fedora template? After switching to 4.0rc4 this stopped working for me in all my VMs.

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Feb 27, 2018

Member
Member

marmarek commented Feb 27, 2018

@rootkovska

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rootkovska

rootkovska Feb 27, 2018

Member

Sure, but I meant: while fixing the default template (for rc5), let's also make sure this is instaled, as otherwise this is perceived as regression.

Member

rootkovska commented Feb 27, 2018

Sure, but I meant: while fixing the default template (for rc5), let's also make sure this is instaled, as otherwise this is perceived as regression.

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Feb 27, 2018

Member

I'm not so sure if we should ship everything that exists installed by default. fedora-26 template with similar package configuration set is much bigger than fedora-25, that's why number of installed packages were reduced. I'd focus on having GUI stuff working, console users will manage.

Member

marmarek commented Feb 27, 2018

I'm not so sure if we should ship everything that exists installed by default. fedora-26 template with similar package configuration set is much bigger than fedora-25, that's why number of installed packages were reduced. I'd focus on having GUI stuff working, console users will manage.

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Feb 27, 2018

Member

(bash-completion is only 270k, so I'm not so much against it, just to keep the template size in mind)

Member

marmarek commented Feb 27, 2018

(bash-completion is only 270k, so I'm not so much against it, just to keep the template size in mind)

@rootkovska

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rootkovska

rootkovska Feb 27, 2018

Member

I'd vote however for not introducing UX regressions compared to the default 3.2 template.

Member

rootkovska commented Feb 27, 2018

I'd vote however for not introducing UX regressions compared to the default 3.2 template.

marmarek added a commit to marmarek/qubes-builder-rpm that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment