New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Qube Manager Sort Options #3848

Closed
qubesissues opened this Issue Apr 23, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@qubesissues

Qubes OS version:

4.0

Affected component(s):

Qubes Manager


Steps to reproduce the behavior:

General notes:

It would be nice if you had more sort options in the Qube Manager.

  1. It would be great to sort by color

  2. It would be great to sort by some second option. For example By color and then alphabetically within that. Or By type of Qube (proxy, template, etc.) and then by template used. And then by color? :)

@andrewdavidwong

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@andrewdavidwong

andrewdavidwong Apr 24, 2018

Member

Closely related: #1022, #3241.

Member

andrewdavidwong commented Apr 24, 2018

Closely related: #1022, #3241.

@mirrorway

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mirrorway

mirrorway Apr 24, 2018

Related to (1), you can group by color by clicking the column header above the padlocks.

mirrorway commented Apr 24, 2018

Related to (1), you can group by color by clicking the column header above the padlocks.

@andrewdavidwong

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@andrewdavidwong

andrewdavidwong Apr 25, 2018

Member

Related to (1), you can group by color by clicking the column header above the padlocks.

In that case, I think point 2 is already covered by #1022, so I'm closing this "not an issue." If anyone believes this is a mistake, please leave a comment, and we'll be happy to take another look. Thank you.

Member

andrewdavidwong commented Apr 25, 2018

Related to (1), you can group by color by clicking the column header above the padlocks.

In that case, I think point 2 is already covered by #1022, so I'm closing this "not an issue." If anyone believes this is a mistake, please leave a comment, and we'll be happy to take another look. Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment