New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove/make optional the prompt for numerous windows #386

Closed
marmarek opened this Issue Mar 8, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@marmarek
Member

marmarek commented Mar 8, 2015

Reported by joanna on 11 Dec 2011 14:47 UTC
I run into the "The VM X created many windows, do you want to allow it?" prompt way too often. Because we essentially do not automatically prevent from DoSes via memory exhaustion from malicious VMs, I think we should make this either 1) optional, 2) change the window threshold to a much higher one?

Sometime the prompt window is displayed below other windows (thanks to KDE's superb focus stealing prevention) and if a user doesn't notice it, then it looks like if the VM got locked up.

Migrated-From: https://wiki.qubes-os.org/ticket/386

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Mar 8, 2015

Member

Comment by marmarek on 12 Dec 2011 13:32 UTC
In XFCE this comes always on top :)
This can be set using gui config file (we have one!). But what should be the default? 400? Infinity? Now is 100.

Member

marmarek commented Mar 8, 2015

Comment by marmarek on 12 Dec 2011 13:32 UTC
In XFCE this comes always on top :)
This can be set using gui config file (we have one!). But what should be the default? 400? Infinity? Now is 100.

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Mar 8, 2015

Member

Comment by marmarek on 13 Dec 2011 22:16 UTC
"can be set" = "I can add such option"...

Member

marmarek commented Mar 8, 2015

Comment by marmarek on 13 Dec 2011 22:16 UTC
"can be set" = "I can add such option"...

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Mar 8, 2015

Member

Comment by joanna on 18 Dec 2011 12:19 UTC
500?

Member

marmarek commented Mar 8, 2015

Comment by joanna on 18 Dec 2011 12:19 UTC
500?

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment

@marmarek marmarek closed this Mar 8, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment