Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upToo much pulseaudio info/debug log #3933
Comments
marmarek
added
the
good first issue
label
May 27, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
Possibly related: #830 |
andrewdavidwong
added
enhancement
C: other
labels
May 27, 2018
andrewdavidwong
added this to the Release 4.1 milestone
May 27, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
marmarek
May 27, 2018
Member
But this isn't @donob4n's first issue.
No, I'm marking low hanging fruits for first time contributors.
No, I'm marking low hanging fruits for first time contributors. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
andrewdavidwong
May 27, 2018
Member
No, I'm marking low hanging fruits for first time contributors.
Ok, but it makes it sound like someone new to reporting issues did a good job on their first try. Do you mind if I rename the label to clarify?
Ok, but it makes it sound like someone new to reporting issues did a good job on their first try. Do you mind if I rename the label to clarify? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
Personally I don't mind, but that's one of github default labels. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
donob4n
May 27, 2018
lol
So is this info useful for something? Better removing it, reducing output rate or doing it optional?
donob4n
commented
May 27, 2018
|
lol So is this info useful for something? Better removing it, reducing output rate or doing it optional? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
marmarek
May 27, 2018
Member
@andrewdavidwong Oh, looks like this is not only one of default labels, but also actively promoted by github
@donob4n It's useful for debugging very weird cases we haven't seen for years. Either removing or making it optional is ok.
|
@andrewdavidwong Oh, looks like this is not only one of default labels, but also actively promoted by github @donob4n It's useful for debugging very weird cases we haven't seen for years. Either removing or making it optional is ok. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
andrewdavidwong
May 27, 2018
Member
Personally I don't mind, but that's one of github default labels.
@andrewdavidwong Oh, looks like this is not only one of default labels, but also actively promoted by github
Ok, looks like my beef is with GitHub, not with you.
No problem. We can stick with this label so that people who are familiar with it from other projects will recognize it here.
Ok, looks like my beef is with GitHub, not with you. No problem. We can stick with this label so that people who are familiar with it from other projects will recognize it here. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
fosslinux
May 28, 2018
I am interested in making a PR for this - should be easy. However, I am worried about the GPG signing. Due to classified reasons, (for now at least) I must keep full anonymity. As a result, I have simply kept my GitHub name as the "Full name" and my GitHub commit email as the "Email address". Is this OK, or is this a problem?
fosslinux
commented
May 28, 2018
|
I am interested in making a PR for this - should be easy. However, I am worried about the GPG signing. Due to classified reasons, (for now at least) I must keep full anonymity. As a result, I have simply kept my GitHub name as the "Full name" and my GitHub commit email as the "Email address". Is this OK, or is this a problem? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
andrewdavidwong
May 28, 2018
Member
I am interested in making a PR for this - should be easy. However, I am worried about the GPG signing. Due to classified reasons, (for now at least) I must keep full anonymity. As a result, I have simply kept my GitHub name as the "Full name" and my GitHub commit email as the "Email address". Is this OK, or is this a problem?
Shouldn't be a problem. We don't require anyone to use their "real" name for anything.
Shouldn't be a problem. We don't require anyone to use their "real" name for anything. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
marmarek
May 28, 2018
Member
As Andrew said, we require to use signatures, but not real names. This is mostly because we don't trust infrastructure, github included. This is one mitigation we take, to not rely on github authentication system too much.
See also here how to keep email private on github.
|
As Andrew said, we require to use signatures, but not real names. This is mostly because we don't trust infrastructure, github included. This is one mitigation we take, to not rely on github authentication system too much. See also here how to keep email private on github. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
fosslinux
commented
May 28, 2018
|
@marmarek @andrewdavidwong Thanks! |
fosslinux
referenced this issue
in QubesOS/qubes-gui-agent-linux
Jun 4, 2018
Merged
Remove unnessecary pulseaudio message #43
marmarek
closed this
in
marmarek/qubes-gui-agent-linux@e396632
Jun 6, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
donob4n
Jun 6, 2018
If the debug is removed are the vars used for something?
static int all = 0, waited = 0, nonwaited = 0, full = 0;
donob4n
commented
Jun 6, 2018
|
If the debug is removed are the vars used for something? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
qubesos-bot
Jul 15, 2018
Automated announcement from builder-github
The package gui-agent-linux has been pushed to the r4.0 testing repository for the CentOS centos7 template.
To test this update, please install it with the following command:
sudo yum update --enablerepo=qubes-vm-r4.0-current-testing
qubesos-bot
commented
Jul 15, 2018
|
Automated announcement from builder-github The package
|
qubesos-bot
added
the
r4.0-centos7-cur-test
label
Jul 15, 2018
qubesos-bot
referenced this issue
in QubesOS/updates-status
Jul 15, 2018
Closed
gui-agent-linux v4.0.11 (r4.0) #586
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
marmarek
Jul 15, 2018
Member
static int all = 0, waited = 0, nonwaited = 0, full = 0;
I don't think so.
I don't think so. |
qubesos-bot
added
r4.0-buster-cur-test
r4.0-jessie-cur-test
labels
Jul 15, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
qubesos-bot
Jul 15, 2018
Automated announcement from builder-github
The component gui-agent-linux (including package pulseaudio-qubes-4.0.11-1.fc26) has been pushed to the r4.0 testing repository for the Fedora template.
To test this update, please install it with the following command:
sudo yum update --enablerepo=qubes-vm-r4.0-current-testing
qubesos-bot
commented
Jul 15, 2018
|
Automated announcement from builder-github The component
|
qubesos-bot
added
the
r4.0-fc26-cur-test
label
Jul 15, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
qubesos-bot
Jul 15, 2018
Automated announcement from builder-github
The package qubes-gui-agent_4.0.11-1+deb9u1 has been pushed to the r4.0 testing repository for the Debian template.
To test this update, first enable the testing repository in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/qubes-*.list by uncommenting the line containing stretch-testing (or appropriate equivalent for your template version), then use the standard update command:
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
qubesos-bot
commented
Jul 15, 2018
|
Automated announcement from builder-github The package
|
added a commit
to marmarek/qubes-gui-agent-linux
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2018
added a commit
to QubesOS/qubes-gui-agent-linux
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2018
qubesos-bot
referenced this issue
in QubesOS/updates-status
Jul 16, 2018
Closed
gui-agent-linux v3.2.23 (r3.2) #589
qubesos-bot
added
r4.0-buster-stable
r4.0-jessie-stable
and removed
r4.0-buster-cur-test
r4.0-jessie-cur-test
labels
Jul 23, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
qubesos-bot
Jul 23, 2018
Automated announcement from builder-github
The package qubes-gui-agent_4.0.11-1+deb9u1 has been pushed to the r4.0 stable repository for the Debian template.
To install this update, please use the standard update command:
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
qubesos-bot
commented
Jul 23, 2018
|
Automated announcement from builder-github The package
|
qubesos-bot
removed
the
r4.0-stretch-cur-test
label
Jul 23, 2018
qubesos-bot
added
the
r4.0-stretch-stable
label
Jul 23, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
qubesos-bot
Jul 23, 2018
Automated announcement from builder-github
The package gui-agent-linux has been pushed to the r4.0 stable repository for the Fedora centos7 template.
To install this update, please use the standard update command:
sudo yum update
qubesos-bot
commented
Jul 23, 2018
|
Automated announcement from builder-github The package
|
qubesos-bot
added
r4.0-centos7-stable
and removed
r4.0-centos7-cur-test
labels
Jul 23, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
qubesos-bot
Jul 23, 2018
Automated announcement from builder-github
The component gui-agent-linux (including package pulseaudio-qubes-4.0.11-1.fc26) has been pushed to the r4.0 stable repository for the Fedora template.
To install this update, please use the standard update command:
sudo yum update
qubesos-bot
commented
Jul 23, 2018
|
Automated announcement from builder-github The component
|
donob4n commentedMay 27, 2018
Qubes OS version:
R4
Affected component(s):
journald, disk usage
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
I found this messages on a lot of vm's, even on fedora template:
May 26 21:44:15 media pulseaudio[828]: write_to_vchan: all=3864000 waited=62012 nonwaited=3801988 full=0
May 26 21:44:58 media pulseaudio[828]: write_to_vchan: all=3872000 waited=62058 nonwaited=3809942 full=0
May 26 21:45:42 media pulseaudio[828]: write_to_vchan: all=3880000 waited=62099 nonwaited=3817901 full=0
May 26 21:46:25 media pulseaudio[828]: write_to_vchan: all=3888000 waited=62141 nonwaited=3825859 full=0
Expected behavior:
If this is a useful info or a debug message log it a reasonable rate, else remove it.
If it is a debug info maybe it should only appear with some debug mode enabled.
Actual behavior:
It logs more than one per minute when playing audio.
General notes:
It is logged here https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-gui-agent-linux/blob/4427218dc382c66a98e22d5e67bdef5a87a5b3ba/pulse/module-vchan-sink.c#L257 .
Related issues: