New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test and publish template/standalonevm 3.2->4.0 migration instruction. #3934

Open
marmarek opened this Issue May 27, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@marmarek
Member

marmarek commented May 27, 2018

I've realized we haven't published migration instruction for this case. While templates/standalonevms are mostly functional when imported from 3.2 backup, there is some missing functionality (for example #3906).

Here is some preliminary version: #1854 (comment)
One thing based on feedback there from @davex25 - all of this needs to be performed in root shell (sudo -s, or qvm-run -u root ... xterm), not individual sudo calls. Because you loose root access before installing qubes-vm-recommended metapackage.

@donob4n

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@donob4n

donob4n May 27, 2018

I have gui broken in standadlone vm's I restored from 3.2

I could get a bash from dom0 via qvm-run, I modified the sources and do an upgrade. But then I lost qrexec too.

donob4n commented May 27, 2018

I have gui broken in standadlone vm's I restored from 3.2

I could get a bash from dom0 via qvm-run, I modified the sources and do an upgrade. But then I lost qrexec too.

@davex25

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@davex25

davex25 May 30, 2018

Documentation should include a step for changing http to https in qubes repo file during the upgrade.

davex25 commented May 30, 2018

Documentation should include a step for changing http to https in qubes repo file during the upgrade.

@awokd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@awokd

awokd Jun 30, 2018

Here's what we (mostly @taradiddles) came up with. If this is what you had in mind, I'll submit to qubes-doc and we can fine-tune there if needed.

awokd commented Jun 30, 2018

Here's what we (mostly @taradiddles) came up with. If this is what you had in mind, I'll submit to qubes-doc and we can fine-tune there if needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment