New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qvm-backup-restore: Consider verify-only option #863

Closed
marmarek opened this Issue Mar 8, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@marmarek
Member

marmarek commented Mar 8, 2015

Reported by axon on 1 Jun 2014 09:24 UTC
"Backups always succeed. It's restores that fail."

Discussion: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/qubes-devel/kZn0XgkcMeQ/discussion

Migrated-From: https://wiki.qubes-os.org/ticket/863

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Mar 8, 2015

Member

Modified by marmarek on 12 Sep 2014 08:05 UTC

Member

marmarek commented Mar 8, 2015

Modified by marmarek on 12 Sep 2014 08:05 UTC

@marmarek marmarek added this to the Release 2.1 (post R2) milestone Mar 8, 2015

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Mar 8, 2015

Member

Comment by marmarek on 15 Sep 2014 23:54 UTC
There is a bug in tar (regarding creating multi-volume archive of sparse files), which affect Qubes backups. Because we are really close to final Qubes R2, it is really bad time for major change like backup format, so as a temporary mitigation, we've decided to implement at least backup verify option as part of R2.

Member

marmarek commented Mar 8, 2015

Comment by marmarek on 15 Sep 2014 23:54 UTC
There is a bug in tar (regarding creating multi-volume archive of sparse files), which affect Qubes backups. Because we are really close to final Qubes R2, it is really bad time for major change like backup format, so as a temporary mitigation, we've decided to implement at least backup verify option as part of R2.

@marmarek marmarek modified the milestones: Release 2, Release 2.1 (post R2) Mar 8, 2015

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Mar 8, 2015

Member

Comment by marmarek on 16 Sep 2014 00:22 UTC
Link to mentioned bug: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2014-09/msg00003.html

Member

marmarek commented Mar 8, 2015

Comment by marmarek on 16 Sep 2014 00:22 UTC
Link to mentioned bug: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2014-09/msg00003.html

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@marmarek

marmarek Mar 8, 2015

Member

Modified by marmarek on 16 Sep 2014 03:42 UTC

Member

marmarek commented Mar 8, 2015

Modified by marmarek on 16 Sep 2014 03:42 UTC

@marmarek marmarek self-assigned this Mar 8, 2015

@marmarek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment