-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Description
Heya, I'm speaking at an event in Jan and noticed this. I added a note to the Google Doc about it and got invited to make a change but don't really feel comfortable doing a PR for a group I've not even been to yet :). Usually you do mission statements along with a Vision Statement - so you kind of have a "what we do" and "what the end goal is" kind thing.
I'd say a mission statement for QC would have some or all of the following:
- To create safe(r) spaces for (the identities you have already listed) to (socialise? network? learn?)
- To make (programming? computing?) a better place for (the identities listed) by (having meetings?)
- Establishing a (European? International?) network of (the identities) who are working on (the issues)
- Challenging and changing structural inequalities around sexuality and gender in (computing? programming?)
- Aiding and enabling people disadvantaged due to gender and/or sexuality to get into (computing)
A vision could be something like:
- Making (programming? computing?) industries and practice a safe and equal space for (the identities)
- Creating a world free of discrimination from gender and sexual discrimination, starting with (computing)
- Making diversity and pay in (programming) reflect that in the rest of the world / across the sector
Hope that gets the juices flowing - mission statements should be a real rallying statement for me, codes of conducts are necessary but a tactic not a strategy, something that we should aim to not need but sadly do.
I'd also consider adding an intersectional statement about how people of diverse gender and sexuality are also of many races, abilities, religions, etc... and that there is no hierarchy of oppression.
BTW I strongly dislike the sentiment behind statements like "We want to be with people like us" and/or "a place for like-minded people" - I personally think they are anti-diversity statements that suggest there is a shared commonality between queer people and we are all the same on some level. I think this is colonialist thought that stands in the way of true diversity but I understand the thought behind it :)
In terms of "the identities" I prefer "people of all genders and sexualities" as this doesn't require self-identification (something fraught in itself) personally.
What do you lot think?
Kim