Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Edited some bits to maintain essay consistency. #1

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 30, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
151 changes: 76 additions & 75 deletions _posts/2019-05-26-revolution-and-systems.md
Expand Up @@ -4,24 +4,24 @@ title: "Silk Road, Revolutions and Systems"
categories: blog
---

Today, I read the [story of Silk Road][silkroad] - How an idealist, Ross
Ulbricht, tired of chasing success the old school way, found his way around
creating an online {% sidenote 'sn-id-darknet' "As a part of the
[darkweb][darknet], it was operated as a Tor hidden service which protects
personal privacy of users by concealing their details from anyone conducting
network surveillance, from Government to their ISP. Additionally, all payments
Today, I read the [story of Silk Road][silkroad]: how the young idealist Ross
Ulbricht, tired of chasing success the old school way, found his way around the **darkweb** to
create an online {% sidenote 'sn-id-darknet' "As a part of the
[darkweb][darknet], it was operated as a *Tor* hidden service which protected the
personal privacy of users by concealing their details from anyone - from the Government to their ISP - conducting
network surveillance. Additionally, all payments
were made using [ Bitcoin ][bitcoin], a cryptocurrency which provides a certain
degree of anonymity." %} bazaar for trading of illicit materials, mainly drugs,
degree of anonymity." %} bazaar for the trading of illicit materials, mainly drugs,
which he named Silk Road.

The aim behind writing this blog post was to think out loud and trying to build
an insight into the oversight of some of the most prominent revolutionaries of
the past.
The aim behind writing this blog post is to think out loud and try to gain
insight into the oversights made by some of the most prominent revolutionaries in
history.

<!--more-->

When operating his online empire, Ross would take on the identity of Dread
Pirate Roberts (~DPR) (borrowing the name from The Princess Bride, in which the
Pirate Roberts (~DPR) (borrowing the name from *The Princess Bride*, in which the
pirate was a mythical character, inhabited by the wearer of the mask).

Ross (aka DPR) was having trouble switching back-and-forth between these
Expand All @@ -41,44 +41,45 @@ beautifully [in the original article ][silkroad]:
> the feverish visionary creating a virtual empire at any cost. Neither truth
> invalidated the other. Ross and DPR can (and did) coexist.

Even until now, if you haven't read the [story][silkroad], please do! - It is
one of the most interesting and riveting cyber-criminology reports I've ever read.

Coming back, well, Ross didn't exactly dream of building this huge empire of
Ross didn't exactly dream of building this huge empire of
illicit business, but it was essentially all baby steps,
{% sidenote 'sn-id-baby' 'As B.J. Neblett said "We are the sum total of our experiences. Those
experiences – be they positive or negative – make us the person we are, at any
given point in our lives. And, like a flowing river, those same experiences, and
those yet to come, continue to influence and reshape the person we are, and the
person we become. None of us are the same as we were yesterday, nor will be
tomorrow."' %}
rooting back to the influence Ludwig von Mises, an Austrian economist who was
described by the story as "a totem of the modern American libertarian
orthodoxy", had on Ross. According to von Mises, a citizen must have economic
freedom to be politically or morally free.

Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler and Ludwig von Mises - They all had an ideology - a
vision of the ideal world, a way of bringing peace to world - an expression
which society must adhere to lead them towards the state of utter completeness
stemming from the influence Ludwig von Mises - an Austrian economist
described in the [story][silkroad] as "a totem of the modern American libertarian
orthodoxy" - had on Ross. According to von Mises, a citizen must have economic
freedom to be politically and morally free.

If you haven't read the [story][silkroad] yet, please do and then come back! It might easily
be one of the most riveting cyber-criminology reports you ever read.

Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler and Ludwig von Mises, they all had an ideology - a
vision of the ideal world, and a way of bringing peace to world. For them, it embodied an
expression which society must adhere to lead them towards utter completeness
and happiness.

The ideology of Hitler was of an ideology of conquest: the "manifest destiny" of
a superior race to conquer, occupy, and control lands of the "lesser" people,
the _Untermenschen_, for the sole benefit of the superior race.
The ideology of Hitler was an ideology of conquest: the "manifest destiny" of
a superior race to conquer, occupy, and control lands of the "lesser" people -
the _Untermenschen_ - for the sole benefit of the superior race.

The ideal society for Stalin was the one in which people contribute to it
The ideal society for Stalin was one in which people contribute to it
because they feel it is their pleasure and responsibility to do so, and in which
people only consume what they need, while mindful of the needs of others.
people only consume what they need while being mindful of the needs of others.

And they executed their ideas, bringing about their 'revolution'!

Both the regimes - The Third Reich and Stalinism were responsible for millions
of deaths and for untold amounts of suffering.
Both regimes - the Third Reich and Stalinism - were responsible for millions
of deaths and untold amounts of suffering.

Although one can argue that the 'revolution' of Ross was nowhere even near their
scale, but that is immaterial to this discussion. It followed the same
pattern which was summed up by Bearman, the author of the original story, rather
well:
Although one can argue that Ross Ulbricht's 'revolution' was nowhere near that
scale, but that is immaterial to our discussion. It followed the same
pattern which was summed up by Bearman rather
well in the original story:

[silkroad]: https://www.wired.com/2015/04/silk-road-1/
[darknet]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darknet
Expand All @@ -99,82 +100,82 @@ _Isn't it strange - How we become the very thing we fight against!_
>
> ― Friedrich W. Nietzsche

For people who prefer fiction over history, what happened with the [finale of
Game of Thrones][gotfinale] was a prime example of this notion. [Spoilers Ahead]
For people who prefer examples in fiction over history, what happened with the [finale of
Game of Thrones][gotfinale] is a prime example of this pattern. [Spoilers Ahead]
In light of everything Daenerys [one of show's main protagonists] accomplished —
birthing dragons out of stone, freeing thousands of slaves, helping the Starks
defeat an army of ice-zombies — the viewers first handedly experienced the
mindset of a revolutionary who decided that they need to liberate the entire
world. Yet, it was when she failed to draw a line between herself and her vision
mindset of a revolutionary who believed that it was incumbent upon her to liberate the entire
world. Yet it was when she failed to draw a line between herself and her vision
{% sidenote 'sn-id-dany' "The time when she succumbed to her temptations,
killing thousands of people in King's Landing" %}, that she failed as a ruler, becoming exactly
what she came to abolish - tyranny. It is worth noting here that all the while
she burned innocent people, she was fueled by the exact same idea - to liberate
the world from tyranny.
burning alive and hence killing thousands of people in King's Landing" %}that she failed as a ruler, becoming exactly
what she had hoped to abolish: tyranny. It is worth noting here that all the while
she unapologetically burnt the innocent, she was fueled by the exact same idea - to liberate
the innocents of the world from tyranny.

[gotfinale]: https://gameofthrones.fandom.com/wiki/Season_8

In Ross's case, the fact that he was feeling unease even as DPR (who was a
rather confident and eloquent character) was the first clue that the shadows of
the doom had already fallen across him - that he had already begun failing
what he had intended to do, but he deceived himself in the name of his idea - in
In Ross's case, the fact that he was feeling uneasy even as DPR (who was a
rather confident and eloquent character); that he had already begun failing
at what he had intended to do was the first clue that the shadows of
doom had already fallen upon him. But he deceived himself in the name of his idea - in
the belief that he was doing the _right thing_.

Is it really this belief and total devotion to your idea that blinds us, or is
it the power and the riches which corrupts us or maybe it is a fundamental
misunderstanding of our very own conceived idea? It might as well be some skewed
combination of all of the above, maybe?
Is it really this belief and total devotion to our idea that blinds us, or is
it the power and the riches which corrupts us? Or maybe it is a fundamental
misunderstanding of our very own conceived idea? Perhaps it might be a skewed
combination of all of the above.

I do not claim that I know the answers to all, or any, of the questions above.
I do not claim to know the answers to any of the above questions.

But let's look through another revolutionary, Mahatma Gandhi and the revolution
But let's look at another revolutionary: Mahatma Gandhi and the revolution
he brought about in India.

{% marginfigure 'mf-id-gandhi' 'assets/img/gandhi.jpg' 'Mahatma Gandhi was
called Bapu (Father) by many, including Jawaharlal Nehru' %}

In response to the [Rowlatt Act][rowlatt] brought by the British and the
In response to the [Rowlatt Act][rowlatt] imposed by the British and the
[Jallianwala Bagh Massacre][jallianwala], Gandhi lead the non-cooperation
movement appealing people to to adopt swadeshi goods and local handicrafts and
to refuse to buy British goods. The movement was based on the principle of
movement, appealing to the masses to adopt swadeshi goods and local handicrafts to
boycott British goods. The movement was based on the principle of
_Ahimsa_ (Non-Violence), and after two years of hard work, it gained full
momentum in 1922. It seemed that the dream of _Swaraj_ (self-governance) was
finally near.
finally turning to reality.

But giving a face to Gandhi's fears, the cases of violence were reported from
But giving a face to Gandhi's fears, cases of violence were reported from
all over the nation, and after the [Chauri-Chaura][chaurichaura]
{% sidenote 'sn-id-chauri' 'A large group of protesters, participating in the
Non-cooperation movement, clashed with police, who opened fire. In retaliation,
{% sidenote 'sn-id-chauri' 'A large group of protesters participating in the
Non-cooperation movement clashed with the police, who opened fire. In retaliation,
the demonstrators attacked and set fire to a police station, killing all of its
occupants.' %}
incident, he decided to call off the protest single-handedly. This was indeed a
very difficult and brave decision on his part - he could have got what he wanted
ignoring these 'mild' cases of violence for the nation, but his moral cadre was
defiant of such a behavior and he chose to voice it.
incident, he decided to call off the protest indefinitely. This was indeed a
very difficult and brave decision on his part - he could have gotten what he wanted and
ignored the 'milder' cases of violence for the nation, but his moral caliber was
defiant of such behavior and he chose to voice it.

It was perhaps because he believed in a perpetual fight, a fight we
all have to fight against our own moral demons, and that the nation must not
resort to the demon of violence.
It was perhaps because he believed in a perpetual fight - a fight we
all have to fight against our own moral demons - in which the nation must not
succumb to the demon of violence.

Subsequently, Gandhi launched many such campaigns perfecting the concept of
Subsequently, Gandhi launched many campaigns perfecting the concept of
[_Satyagrah_][satyagrah] {% sidenote 'sn-id-satyagrah' "सत्याग्रह (Satyagrah):
सत्य (Truth) + आग्रह (insistence) - सत्य के लिए आग्रह - _The truth force_, is a
particular form of non-violent civil resistance" %} finally leading the nation
particular form of non-violent civil resistance" %}, finally leading the nation
to independence in 1947.

[rowlatt]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rowlatt_Act
[jallianwala]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jallianwala_Bagh_massacre
[chaurichaura]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chauri_Chaura_incident
[satyagrah]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satyagraha

I guess we all get to play Ross sometimes, and I believe that creating moral
barriers, as Gandhi did, to encourage the high moral regard of one's own
values - be it a ruthless round of questioning one's very own beliefs and
I guess we all get to play Ross sometimes, and I believe that creating
barriers, as Gandhi did, to encourage the higher moral stance of one's own
values - be it by ruthless questioning of one's own beliefs and
biases, or having an external support mechanism for keeping oneself on track -
would help us dodge the doom of our system.

But, I do find it very interesting to ponder upon how 'easy' it is to be
lost, to be engrossed so deeply into your vision to forget what it stood for in
the first place, to cross the rather fine line drawn between us and the monster.
And how tools like identities, the different masks we wear, makes it all the
more easier.
But I do find it very interesting to ponder upon how 'easy' it is to be
lost, to be engrossed so deeply into our visions to forget what it stood for in
the first place; to cross the rather fine line drawn between us and the monster,
and how tools like identities and the different masks we wear make it all the
more easier.