Skip to content

Conversation

@kzhuravl
Copy link

@kzhuravl kzhuravl commented Dec 6, 2017

No description provided.

Coby Tayree and others added 30 commits November 21, 2017 10:04
Introducing Vector Neural Network Instructions, consisting of:
vpdpbusd{s}
vpdpwssd{s}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40208


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318746 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Mention the purpose of the BICri tests added by r318398, as requested in
post-commit review.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
vpopcnt{b,w}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40213



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes instregex for interger vector add/sub instructions

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40254


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318749 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's on all other LWP instruction but I missed it from lwpins, despite similar scheduling behaviour. 

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318751 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reviewers: mstorsjo

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40286

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As pointed out in post-commit review of r318738, `return ReplaceNode(..)` when 
both ReplaceNode and the current function return void is confusing. This patch 
moves to using a more obvious early return, and moves to just using an if to 
catch the one case we currently care about. A future patch that adds further 
custom instruction selection can introduce a switch.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318757 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
All match equivalent basic classes (WritePHAdd, WriteFAdd etc.) according to both the AMD 15h SOG and Agner's tables.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318758 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The generated diagnostic by the AsmMatcher isn't always applicable to the AsmOperand.

This is because the code will only update the diagnostic if it is more specific than the previous diagnostic. However, when having validated operands and 'moved on' to a next operand (for some instruction/alias for which all previous operands are valid), if the diagnostic is InvalidOperand, than that should be set as the diagnostic, not the more specific message about a previous operand for some other instruction/alias candidate.

Reviewers: craig.topper, olista01, rengolin, stoklund

Reviewed By: olista01

Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40011

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318759 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Almost too trivial to worry about, but it seems worth having consistency with
upcoming commits.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318760 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: VOP2b instructions (v_subbrev_u32, v_add_i32 ...) shouldn't support OMod operand in SDWA encoding

Reviewers: rampitec, dp

Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40172

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318761 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is NFC, as the matcher would continue looping up to the maximum
number of operands with no effect, but this should improve performance a
bit, and makes the debug trace clearer.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36744



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318769 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- We can still emit this error if the actual instruction has two or more
  operands missing compared to the expected one.
- We should only emit this error once per instruction.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36746



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318770 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was causing the (invalid) predicated versions of the NEON VRINTX and
VRINTZ instructions to be accepted, with the condition code being ignored.

Also, there is no NEON VRINTR instruction, so that part of the check was not
necessary.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39193



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318771 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
First step in adding MemorySSA as dependency for loop pass manager.
Adding the dependency under a flag.

New pass manager: MSSA pointer in LoopStandardAnalysisResults can be null.
Legacy and new pass manager: Use cl::opt EnableMSSALoopDependency. Disabled by default.

Reviewers: sanjoy, davide, gberry

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40274

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318772 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are pre-UAL syntax, and we don't support any other pre-UAL instructions,
with the exception of FLDMX/FSTMX, which don't have a UAL equivalent. Therefore
there's no reason to keep them or their AsmParser hacks around.

With the AsmParser hacks removed, the FLDMX and FSTMX instructions get the same
operand diagnostics as the UAL instructions.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39196



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It works just like __cyg_profile_func_enter but takes no arguments.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318783 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The pass was renamed in r318195.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
…ects.

This partially reverts r298851.  The the underlying issue is that we don't
currently model the dependency between mrs (read system register) and
msr (write system register) instructions.

Something like the below should never be reordered:

 msr TPIDR_EL0, x0  ;; set thread pointer
 mrs x8, TPIDR_EL0  ;; read thread pointer

but was being reordered after r298851.  The functional part of the patch
that wasn't reverted needed to remain in place in order to not break
r299462.

PR35317

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Segment moves to memory are always 16-bit. Remove invalid 32 and 64
bit variants.

Recommiting with missing clang inline assembly test change.

Fixes PR34478.

Reviewers: rnk, craig.topper

Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39847

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318797 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
…ctions to icelake CPU.

This is based on table 1-1 of the October 2017 revision of Intel® Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features Programming Reference

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318799 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
…ow load folding.

The commuting patterns for the AVX version actually still had priority over the new patterns.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MatzeB and others added 23 commits November 28, 2017 03:23
Additional checks for phi operands:
- first operand should be a virtual register def. It should not be
  tied, implicit, internalread, earlyclobber or a read.
- The other operands should be register/mbb operands next to each other
- The register operands should not be implicit, internalread,
  earlyclobber, debug or tied.
- We can perform most of the PHI checks even for unreachable blocks.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes cases where we wouldn't perform various register operand
checks just because we didn't happen to have a definition in the
MCInstrDesc. This changes the code to only skip the tests that actually
depend on the MCInstrDesc definition.

This makes the machine verifier spot the problem from
https://llvm.org/PR33071 after the pass that actually caused it.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319141 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Unoptimized IR can have linear sequences of stores to an array, where the
initial GEP for the first store is formed from the pointer to the array, and the
GEP for each store after the first is formed from the previous GEP with some
offset in an inductive fashion.

The (large) resulting DAG when analyzed by DAGCombine undergoes an excessive
number of combines as each store node is examined every time its' offset node
is combined with any child of the offset. One of the transformations is
findBetterNeighborChains which assists MergeConsecutiveStores. The former
relies on repeated chain walking to do its' work, however MergeConsecutiveStores
is disabled at O0 which makes the transformation redundant.

Any optimization level other than O0 would invoke InstCombine which would
resolve the chain of GEPs into flat base + offset GEP for each store which
does not exhibit the repeated examination of each store to the array.

Disabling this optimization fixes an excessive compile time issue (30~ minutes
for the test case provided) at O0.

Reviewers: niravd, craig.topper, t.p.northover

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40193


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fast-isel routines need to bail out in the case that fast-isel
fails on the operands.

This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35064


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319144 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r319073.

Bot fails with a mismatch that looks like pygments-generated HTML.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
…pass control flow to successors

This is to address a problem similar to those in D37460 for Scalar PRE. We should not
PRE across an instruction that may not pass execution to its successor unless it is safe
to speculatively execute it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38619


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319147 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, we use a set of pairs to cache responces like `CompareSCEVComplexity(X, Y) == 0`. If we had
proved that `CompareSCEVComplexity(S1, S2) == 0` and `CompareSCEVComplexity(S2, S3) == 0`,
this cache does not allow us to prove that `CompareSCEVComplexity(S1, S3)` is also `0`.

This patch replaces this set with `EquivalenceClasses` any two values from the same set are equal from
point of `CompareSCEVComplexity`. This, in particular, allows us to prove the fact from example above.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40428


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319149 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The priorities in the section name suffixes are zero padded,
allowing the linker to just do a lexical sort.

Add zero padding for .ctors sections in ELF as well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40407

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319150 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, we use a set of pairs to cache responces like `CompareValueComplexity(X, Y) == 0`. If we had
proved that `CompareValueComplexity(S1, S2) == 0` and `CompareValueComplexity(S2, S3) == 0`,
this cache does not allow us to prove that `CompareValueComplexity(S1, S3)` is also `0`.

This patch replaces this set with `EquivalenceClasses` that merges Values into equivalence sets so that
any two values from the same set are equal from point of `CompareValueComplexity`. This, in particular,
allows us to prove the fact from example above.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40429


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The PeepholeOptimizer pass calls this function solely based on checking
DefMI->isMoveImmediate(), which only checks the MoveImm bit of the
instruction description. So it's up to FoldImmediate itself to properly
check that DefMI *actually* moves from an immediate.

I don't have a separate test case for this, but the next patch introduces
a test case which happens to crash without this change.

This error is caught by the assertion in MachineOperand::getImm().

Change-Id: I88e7cdbcf54d75e1a296822e6fe5f9a5f095bbf8

Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec

Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40342

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319155 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The entire algorithm operates per basic-block, so for cache locality
it should be better to re-optimize a basic-block immediately rather than
in a separate loop.

I don't have performance measurements.

Change-Id: I85106570bd623c4ff277faaa50ee43258e1ddcc5

Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec

Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits, t-tye

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40344

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319156 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
I think we do not need to analyze debug intrinsics here, as they should
not impact codegen. This has 2 benefits: 1) slightly less work to do and
2) avoiding generating optimization remarks for converting calls to
debug intrinsics to tail calls, which are not really helpful for users.

Based on work by Sander de Smalen.

Reviewers: davide, trentxintong, aprantl

Reviewed By: aprantl

Subscribers: llvm-commits, JDevlieghere

Tags: #debug-info

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40440

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319158 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
…operands when profitable.

The core idea is to (re-)introduce some redundancies where their cost is
hidden by the cost of materializing immediates for constant operands of
PHI nodes. When the cost of the redundancies is covered by this,
avoiding materializing the immediate has numerous benefits:
1) Less register pressure
2) Potential for further folding / combining
3) Potential for more efficient instructions due to immediate operand

As a motivating example, consider the remarkably different cost on x86
of a SHL instruction with an immediate operand versus a register
operand.

This pattern turns up surprisingly frequently, but is somewhat rarely
obvious as a significant performance problem.

The pass is entirely target independent, but it does rely on the target
cost model in TTI to decide when to speculate things around the PHI
node. I've included x86-focused tests, but any target that sets up its
immediate cost model should benefit from this pass.

There is probably more that can be done in this space, but the pass
as-is is enough to get some important performance on our internal
benchmarks, and should be generally performance neutral, but help with
more extensive benchmarking is always welcome.

One awkward part is that this pass has to be scheduled after
*everything* that can eliminate these kinds of redundancies. This
includes SimplifyCFG, GVN, etc. I'm open to suggestions about better
places to put this. We could in theory make it part of the codegen pass
pipeline, but there doesn't really seem to be a good reason for that --
it isn't "lowering" in any sense and only relies on pretty standard cost
model based TTI queries, so it seems to fit well with the "optimization"
pipeline model. Still, further thoughts on the pipeline position are
welcome.

I've also only implemented this in the new pass manager. If folks are
very interested, I can try to add it to the old PM as well, but I didn't
really see much point (my use case is already switched over to the new
PM).

I've tested this pretty heavily without issue. A wide range of
benchmarks internally show no change outside the noise, and I don't see
any significant changes in SPEC either. However, the size class
computation in tcmalloc is substantially improved by this, which turns
into a 2% to 4% win on the hottest path through tcmalloc for us, so
there are definitely important cases where this is going to make
a substantial difference.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37467

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319164 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Certain ARM implementations treat icache clear instruction as a memory read,
and CPU segfaults on trying to clear cache on !PROT_READ page.
We workaround this in Memory::protectMappedMemory by adding
PROT_READ to affected pages, clearing the cache, and then setting
desired protection.

This fixes "AllocationTests/MappedMemoryTest.***/3" unit-tests on
affected hardware.

Reviewers: psmith, zatrazz, kristof.beyls, lhames

Reviewed By: lhames

Subscribers: llvm-commits, krytarowski, peter.smith, jgreenhalgh, aemerson,
             rengolin

Patch by maxim-kuvrykov! 

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40423



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319166 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LLVM Coding Standards:
  Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and
  command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel
  case, and start with a lower case letter (e.g. openFile() or isFoo()).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40416

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319168 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
@kzhuravl kzhuravl requested a review from lmoriche December 6, 2017 21:56
@kzhuravl
Copy link
Author

kzhuravl commented Dec 7, 2017

Ping.

Copy link

@searlmc1 searlmc1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kzhuravl kzhuravl merged commit aa423eb into roc-1.7.x Dec 11, 2017
@kzhuravl kzhuravl deleted the roc-1.7.x-rc4 branch December 11, 2017 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.