Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Created lwIP repo with NAT ported to latest git version #679

Closed
ajaybhargav opened this issue Nov 19, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Created lwIP repo with NAT ported to latest git version #679

ajaybhargav opened this issue Nov 19, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@ajaybhargav
Copy link

Cleaned up and ported to latest git version. I have also tested it on my test board. NAT works great. Thanks for making this possible.
https://github.com/ajaybhargav/lwip_nat

Regards,
Ajay Bhargav

@BernardXiong
Copy link
Member

Yes, I found it. If any updates, please feed back to RT-Thread thanks!

BTW, I just ported the lwIP 2.0.0 version to RT-Thread.

2016-11-19 21:46 GMT+08:00 Ajay Bhargav notifications@github.com:

Cleaned up and ported to latest git version. I have also tested it on my
test board. NAT works great. Thanks for making this possible.
https://github.com/ajaybhargav/lwip_nat

Regards,
Ajay Bhargav


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#679, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLv_85KzIBtKNAlHE9mIXLojc3Jvcfzks5q_v2bgaJpZM4K3Qdi
.

@ajaybhargav
Copy link
Author

Yes I will, I have did some cleanup in the NAT code so that it complies to lwIP guidelines. Also thanks for responding to lwIP email thread. Once the license issue gets resolved, I will submit matches to lwIP. NAT will then be officially supported in lwIP. I will also keep an eye on RT-Thread for any updates in NAT source. You can try to integrate my lwIP source in RT-Thread as submodule maybe. I will keep the repo updated to lwIP head revision.

@ajaybhargav
Copy link
Author

Is there any update on licensing of code? If Author permits dual license then it might solve the issue. We can mainline NAT code.

@BernardXiong
Copy link
Member

@ajaybhargav
There is no license issue for NAT code. I have asked @hichard, there is no license issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants