Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zink Ore #1800

Open
Zalupa-Konya opened this issue Mar 30, 2019 · 9 comments

Comments

@Zalupa-Konya
Copy link

@Zalupa-Konya Zalupa-Konya commented Mar 30, 2019

I can not find zink ore. Where to find her? I also have no steam engines. this is a bug? 1.12.2

@Bovive

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@Bovive Bovive commented Apr 1, 2019

I have also been unable to locate Zinc.

@LuigiHutch

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@LuigiHutch LuigiHutch commented Apr 1, 2019

Zinc can be found around Y30 as shown in the config, you will just have to keep looking. Steam Engines have not been ported

@Bovive

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@Bovive Bovive commented Apr 1, 2019

After pulling up my world in MCEdit it appears that it is just not loading in older chunks. I enabled retrogen for the zinc, however the Railcraft Retrogen mod on Curseforge is not compatible with 1.12.2.

@Zalupa-Konya

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@Zalupa-Konya Zalupa-Konya commented Apr 3, 2019

Zinc can be found around Y30 as shown in the config, you will just have to keep looking. Steam Engines have not been ported

Oh, thanks!

@et-nik

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@et-nik et-nik commented Jun 5, 2019

I faced this problem.

Fixed by disabling IC2 Macerator recipes for Ore Dusts in railcraft.cfg config.

Find:

            # 
            # change to 'ores=false' to disable the IC2 Macerator recipes for Ore Dusts
            # 
            B:ores=true

And change B:ores to false value:

            # 
            # change to 'ores=false' to disable the IC2 Macerator recipes for Ore Dusts
            # 
            B:ores=false
@Darkfiend009

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@Darkfiend009 Darkfiend009 commented Aug 3, 2019

The above did not fix the issue for me. Still cannot find Zinc anywhere. Enabled retrogen for Zinc too so i could try and spawn it any way possible.

@ktole1999

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@ktole1999 ktole1999 commented Aug 12, 2019

i do not have this problem with railcraft-12.0.0 in FTB-Revelations

@charliegc4

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@charliegc4 charliegc4 commented Sep 19, 2019

Mined a 265 x 265 block down to bedrock. No a single block of Zinc! Not on y=30, not anywhere.

--edit: expanded that to 400 x 265. Still nothing.

--edit: my hole is now 400 x 400. Still nothing. I have digital miners also in different biomes, and none of them find Zinc. What is the distribution of Zinc supposed to be? Maybe I could just cheat and give myself x blocks of zinc ore for every 10000 others I mine.

@sa-shiro

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@sa-shiro sa-shiro commented Oct 27, 2019

Same issue

After tweaking around a lot I managed to generate zinc but with an very rare amount (0.01% at y30-y40)

Also the world module overrides every world gen (especially CofH World (Thermal Expansion) so you can't disable / enable and tweak ores with cofhWorld or similar mods)

It would be nice, if we could use cofhWorld to manage railcraft ores

Edit

Removing every ore gen file from /railcraft/ores/ let's cofhWorld control the worlgen but zinc as
"block": "railcraft:ore_metal",
"metadata": 5,
Generates Copper with a green texture and an invalid item texture

Edit:
Fixed it with CofhWorld:
Using the following code structure makes it able to handle CofhWorld to manage any railcraft ore:

....
"block": { "name": "railcraft:ore_metal", "metadata": 5 },
....

Note that metadata is actually deprecated so you may want to use properties:

....
"block":  {
    "name": "railcraft:ore_metal",
    "properties": {
        "variant": "zinc"
        }
    },
....
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
8 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.