Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

?? !! is pointing to the wrong place #1851

Closed
JJ opened this issue Mar 18, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

?? !! is pointing to the wrong place #1851

JJ opened this issue Mar 18, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@JJ
Copy link
Contributor

JJ commented Mar 18, 2018

It points to "index", which mentions it at the end of the examples. https://docs.perl6.org/routine/??%20!!
Is that correct?

@AlexDaniel
Copy link
Member

AlexDaniel commented Mar 18, 2018

Yes, of course not.

I think it's documented here: link

@AlexDaniel AlexDaniel changed the title Is ?? !! pointing to the right place? ?? !! is pointing to the wrong place Mar 18, 2018
@JJ
Copy link
Contributor Author

JJ commented Mar 18, 2018 via email

@cfa
Copy link
Contributor

cfa commented Mar 19, 2018

The link is broken because the ?s need to be escaped; compare

https://docs.perl6.org/routine/??%20!!

with

https://docs.perl6.org/routine/%3F%3F%20!!.

@JJ
Copy link
Contributor Author

JJ commented Mar 19, 2018

The problem is that it's broken on the index... So we'll have to see how that's generated and how it affects everything else.

JJ added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 19, 2018
Which means it fixes #1677 but it actually does nothing to #1851,
which has completely disappeared.
@JJ JJ closed this as completed in 1066bb3 Mar 20, 2018
@JJ JJ reopened this Apr 8, 2018
@JJ
Copy link
Contributor Author

JJ commented Apr 8, 2018

Now ?? !! has disappeared from the index, so I'm reopening the issue. Related #1894

@JJ JJ closed this as completed in 5a656e4 Apr 28, 2018
@AlexDaniel
Copy link
Member

Wait, what's “⁇ ‼”? These are unicode characters, and we actually had support for them for a little bit (but it never ended up being in any release). But why are these characters used in the docs?

@AlexDaniel AlexDaniel reopened this Apr 28, 2018
@JJ
Copy link
Contributor Author

JJ commented Apr 28, 2018 via email

@JJ JJ closed this as completed in d5518b7 Apr 28, 2018
@AlexDaniel
Copy link
Member

Wait, but… it's much better now of course, but it's still not linked as an “infix” op, and so it doesn't even appear in this list: https://docs.perl6.org/routine-operator.html

Note that ff operator that is documented right below it works correctly (can be searched for and exists in the list of ops).

@AlexDaniel AlexDaniel reopened this Apr 28, 2018
@JJ
Copy link
Contributor Author

JJ commented Apr 28, 2018 via email

@JJ JJ closed this as completed in 2adf40d Apr 28, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants