New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix duplicated index entries and avoid them in the future by adding a test. #1912
Comments
|
For instance, the first: There should be some test for this, I guess... |
|
Eliminates |
Because the code that generates indexes is terra incognita and changing the grammar declarator from one place to another leads to errors. Change related to #1912 remains in place.
|
Duplicate index entries are back with a vengeance. We should not only eliminate them, but add a test so that they don't happen again. And in order to do that we need clear indexing specs, which we don't now. |
|
These are the duplicated index entries right now: Besides, the message about duplicated entries is cryptic. I have no idea where they are... |
|
Please take this into account @antoniogamiz when working with the new Perl6::Documentable #1937 |
|
Well, I have been investigating and it looks like the ``#ixxx` corresponds to the position of that reference in the general TOC of BigPage. I have made a script to find them with a clearer output => https://gist.github.com/antoniogamiz/8b628a274954adb5f364322615a159b5. This is the output: I will add it as a test in the new site. |
|
@coke this might be interesting, I guess we can just copy the script to the repo |
|
Probably requires slightly more updates than that, but yes, let's add it to xt/ |
When doing
makeAmong the gaggle of errors and warnings that pod2onebigpage emits. That would need a separate issue, or just point to #1823.
This error is also found in #1910
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: