New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some glossary terms have no description and others need to be moved around since they are not in alphabetical order #622
Comments
|
Anything that ties to a type (or some other docs that already exist) we can remove from the glossary list. |
|
I filled some items with links, so probably they can be marked as done. |
|
@Altai-man I already have some progress on this. So no, definitely not against. |
|
I'll remove such entries tomorrow and update the table above then. |
For example, remove stuff that is tied to a type (per discussion on #622)
|
@Altai-man I already had it gathering dust (yay for |
…ass section. This commit is a part of #622 resolving process. Feel free to revert.
|
I removed Hash with 75a689d, but it wasn't mentioned in the list above. |
|
I'm reopening this, because there seem to be some terms here that were not in the #728. |
Things were added because they have to be explained in the glossary, but nobody bothered to write a proper description yet.
Since most of that stuff was moved from S99, perhaps it would make sense to delete some of the items. However, most of these terms actually need a description.
Please check items once they've been described or removed from the glossary. Team members can remove items from this list once they've been resolved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: