Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Undocumented: uniprop, unimatch #900

Closed
zoffixznet opened this issue Sep 10, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Undocumented: uniprop, unimatch #900

zoffixznet opened this issue Sep 10, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
docs Documentation issue (primary issue type) good first issue If you want to dive in, this would be a good place to start

Comments

@zoffixznet
Copy link
Contributor

zoffixznet commented Sep 10, 2016

There are some routines that don't appear to be documented (nothing shows up in the search):

    method uniprop(|c)      { uniprop(self, |c) }
    method unimatch(|c)     { unimatch(self, |c) }

    method uniprop-int(|c)  { uniprop-int(self, |c) }
    method uniprop-bool(|c) { uniprop-bool(self, |c) }
    method uniprop-str(|c)  { uniprop-str(self, |c) }

The last three are not in the spectest and I don't know whether they should be.

@zoffixznet zoffixznet added docs Documentation issue (primary issue type) LHF labels Sep 10, 2016
@samcv samcv self-assigned this Dec 10, 2016
@samcv
Copy link
Collaborator

samcv commented Dec 12, 2016

I've added uniprop, unimatch and uniprops to the docs. I also think uniprop-str/bool/int are kind of redundant... A better part of the spec would be that uniprop would return Int's, Bool's, Str's depending on the property.

@samcv
Copy link
Collaborator

samcv commented Dec 18, 2016

This has been fixed in a4292f5
Closing 👍

@samcv samcv closed this as completed Dec 18, 2016
@coke coke added good first issue If you want to dive in, this would be a good place to start and removed LHF labels Apr 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation issue (primary issue type) good first issue If you want to dive in, this would be a good place to start
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants