New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Second part of entries cleanup #743
Conversation
…edia and local links to them
|
Well, I think that trying to create an alternative encyclopedia of commonly used IT terms just makes no sense, so I am all for it (as you might have guessed, given my #728 report). However, could I ask you to work a bit more on this pull request?
Also, have you tried grepping for these terms in the rest of the docs? We don't really want more broken links. |
|
1.Its already fixed with f96c6a1 Yes, I check it with We have allomorph, NYI and IRC stuff described, so I'm assuming it's safe. By the way, it's only Glossary page uses it's own terms a lot, that's why it took me a bit of work to clean up all links there. |
|
Right. OK, good to go then. Opinions? |
|
Any chance we could get that merge conflict fixed up? |
|
Looks good, I'd say all things being equal that we merge it and see where we stand after that. |
|
Speaking of something else, I think that it's time to merge this. :) Nobody opposed really, so if there are some good reasons not to do that I guess that we will hear them after the merge. |
According to #728 discussion, this is a patch that removes glossary items which just point to wikipedia pages.
Should we remove them or not is still a debatable question, so don't merge this "Just because".
Opinions are still needed.