Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add update for Ddt to v0.5.3 #403

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 28, 2018
Merged

Add update for Ddt to v0.5.3 #403

merged 1 commit into from Jul 28, 2018

Conversation

kalkin
Copy link
Contributor

@kalkin kalkin commented Jul 28, 2018

See https://github.com/kalkin/Ddt

Thank you for submitting a module to the Perl 6 Ecosystem!

Uploading Perl 6 modules to CPAN is the preferred way of distributing modules, since GitHub is not a CDN. If you have the option, please use that route instead of adding the module here.

If adding a new module please review the following check boxes and check the appropriate boxes by going to the preview tab and checking them interactively or alternatively replacing the space in the checkboxes with an X. Your work is appreciated and every module helps make the Perl 6 Ecosystem a bigger and better place ♥

  • I agree to the usage of the META file as listed here.

  • I have a license field listed in my META file that is one of https://spdx.org/licenses

    • My license is not one of those found on spdx.org but I do have a license field.
      In this case make sure you have a license URL listed under support. See this example.
    • I don't have a license field. Yes, I understand this is not recommended.

@JJ
Copy link
Contributor

JJ commented Jul 28, 2018

Is there some reason why different versions of Ddt are included in META.list? Wouldn't it be better to just have the version number in META6.json in the main directory.

@kalkin
Copy link
Contributor Author

kalkin commented Jul 28, 2018

AFAIK this is (was?) a common tactic to offer all different versions of a package to the user.

@JJ
Copy link
Contributor

JJ commented Jul 28, 2018

I wouldn't say that's the case anymore. I only see different versions of this module. There are other mechanisms, which are probably preferred, to do this, such as using different :api within the same module.

@JJ JJ merged commit d2c2878 into master Jul 28, 2018
@ugexe
Copy link
Contributor

ugexe commented Jul 28, 2018

Lets stop speculating on how the ecosystem works -- its extremely easy to test and see that its perfectly fine to have multiple urls in META.list. I challenge anyone to tell me why this would not be considered valid.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants