Parenthesized for loop is eager, even with lazy keyword

[p6rt]

Migrated from rt.perl.org#130572 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT130572$

[p6rt]

From @smls

  ➜ say (for ^4 { .say }).WHAT;
  0
  1
  2
  3
  (List)

  ➜ say (lazy for ^4 { .say }).WHAT;
  0
  1
  2
  3
  (Seq)

I would have expected an output of just `(Seq)` in both cases, or at
least in the second case.

The synopses don't seem to make a statement on whether a `List` or
`Seq` should be returned, but S04 is quite clear that both should be
lazy <https://design.perl6.org/S04.html#line_688>:

  lazy loops can be indicated by putting the loop in parens
  or brackets​:

  (... if COND for LIST) # lazy list comprehension
  [for LIST { ... }]
  (loop { ... })

  or by use of either a statement prefix or a phaser in
  statement form​:

  lazy for LIST { ... }
  ENTER for LIST { ... }

According to bisectable and committable
<https://gist.github.com/dd0b5601f4198d88bbfd8dc746d7eb25>, Rakudo has
always done it like it does now, though.

---

This is Rakudo version 2016.12-315-gdaf7e5185 built on MoarVM version
2016.12-113-gd1da1bac
implementing Perl 6.c.

[p6rt]

From @smls

This bug is still present in

Rakudo version 2017.08-8-g753c9a5ea built on MoarVM version 2017.08.1-19-g151a2563
implementing Perl 6.c.

[p6rt]

From @dogbert17

On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 05​:15​:41 -0700, smls75@​gmail.com wrote​:

This bug is still present in

Rakudo version 2017.08-8-g753c9a5ea built on MoarVM version 2017.08.1-
19-g151a2563
implementing Perl 6.c

As per commit rakudo/rakudo@cf1673d
the second case now works as intended.

[p6rt]

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

[p6rt]

From @dogbert17

On Sun, 12 May 2019 07​:36​:16 -0700, jan-olof.hendig@​bredband.net wrote​:

On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 05​:15​:41 -0700, smls75@​gmail.com wrote​:

This bug is still present in

Rakudo version 2017.08-8-g753c9a5ea built on MoarVM version
2017.08.1-
19-g151a2563
implementing Perl 6.c

As per commit
rakudo/rakudo@cf1673d
the second case now works as intended.

As for the first case, see https://colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6-dev?date=2019-05-12#l48

should be set to testneeded

[p6rt]

From @usev6

Back in 2017 jnthn++ already added a test for lazy for loops with Raku/roast@3659ede. Since the evaluations in this ticket also take the type into considerations, I've added a new test to S32-list/seq.t with Raku/roast@207171b

I'm closing this ticket as 'resolved'.

[p6rt]

From @usev6

Back in 2017 jnthn++ already added a test for lazy for loops with Raku/roast@3659ede. Since the evaluations in this ticket also take the type into considerations, I've added a new test to S32-list/seq.t with Raku/roast@207171b

I'm closing this ticket as 'resolved'.

[p6rt]

@usev6 - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'