Some more fudging

Specifcally by making 2 skipped non-test lines tests

S09-hashes/objecthash.t

@@ -16,15 +16,15 @@ plan 31;
     dies_ok { %h{Mu.new} = 3 }, 'Any-typed hash does not like Mu keys';
     #?pugs todo
     ok %h.keys[0] === $a, 'returned key is correct';
-}
+} #4
 
 {
     my %h{Int};
     %h{2} = 3;
     is %h{1 + 1}, 3, 'value-type semantics';
     #?pugs todo
     dies_ok { %h{'foo'} }, 'non-conformant type dies';
-}
+} #2
 
 # combinations of typed and objecthash
 { 
@@ -64,26 +64,26 @@ plan 31;
     lives_ok { %h.push: 0.9 => 3 }, 'Hash.push without array creation is OK';
     dies_ok  { %h.push: 1 => 3 },   'Hash.push key type check failure';
     dies_ok  { %h.push: 1.1 => 0.2 }, 'Hash.push value type check failure';
-}
+} #18
 
 {
     my %h{Any};
     %h = 1, 2;
     #?pugs todo
     ok %h.keys[0] === 1, 'list assignment + object hashes';
-}
+} #1
 
 {
     my %h{Mu};
     #?rakudo 6 skip 'oh noes, it dies'
-    %h{Mu} = 2;
+    ok %h{Mu} = 2, "just make the fudging work";
     #?pugs todo
     is %h{Mu}, 2, 'using Mu as a key';
-    %h{Any} = 3;
+    ok %h{Any} = 3, "just make the fudging work";
     #?pugs todo
     is %h{Any}, 3, 'using Any as a key';
     #?pugs todo
     is %h{ Mu, Any }.join(","), "2,3", 'check slice access on Mu';
     #?pugs todo
     is %h{*}.join(","), "2,3", 'check whatever access with Mu as key';
-}
+} #6