back out word? change? #3

slyrus opened this Issue Mar 2, 2012 · 1 comment


None yet
2 participants

slyrus commented Mar 2, 2012

I can see the rationale behind changing word?, but it took me a while to figure out why my parser stopped working when I updated cl-parser-combinators last night. Perhaps a strict-word? that is only letters, leaving the old alphanum word? in place might cause less damage?

@Ramarren Ramarren closed this in eaafdd4 Mar 2, 2012

slyrus commented Mar 3, 2012

Thanks! I I still think a strict-word? would be a nice (trivial) addition, but not breaking the old word? behavior is a good thing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment