Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unique-ify timestamps before merge of multiple ticks (closes #76) #77

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2015

Conversation

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel commented Oct 1, 2015

Pending more testing against live data, thanks to @joshuaulrich for the follow-up yesterday.

I'll follow up here if once I hear from the colleague you spotted the "infelicity" in the first place.

johnlaing added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2015
unique-ify timestamps before merge of multiple ticks (closes #76)
@johnlaing johnlaing merged commit 56af0c5 into master Oct 1, 2015
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details
@johnlaing
Copy link
Contributor

@johnlaing johnlaing commented Oct 1, 2015

This looks straightforward enough, but I don't use xts so I have no independent view on whether this makes sense.

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member Author

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel commented Oct 1, 2015

You did read that I write 'pending testing', right? ;-)
Should be all good though. I did some casual testing last eve, but someone is going to over it with a finer comb to make sure that right bid/ask value precede trades etc.

@johnlaing
Copy link
Contributor

@johnlaing johnlaing commented Oct 1, 2015

I did, but I misunderstood what you meant. To me, a pull request means "this is ready to go". So I merged it...

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member Author

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel commented Oct 1, 2015

How about if we agree that PRs are invitation for comment by other team members. If I wanted to commit directly, I would (and do, for trivial things).

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel deleted the bugfix/multiple-ticks branch Oct 3, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.