Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reshape on multiple columns fails when args are passed as named lists #2949

Closed
sunbee opened this issue Jun 21, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Reshape on multiple columns fails when args are passed as named lists #2949

sunbee opened this issue Jun 21, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
bug
Milestone

Comments

@sunbee
Copy link

@sunbee sunbee commented Jun 21, 2018

Is it possible to reshape on multiple columns by passing a list of column names (value.var) along with a list of aggregation functions (fun.aggregate). This works well when those lists are explicitly passed to the function arguments. It appears to result in an error condition if the lists are passed as variables.

dt = data.table(x=sample(5,20,TRUE), y=sample(2,20,TRUE), 
                z=sample(letters[1:2], 20,TRUE), d1 = runif(20), d2=1L)
funs = list(sum, mean)
vars = list("d1", "d2")
dcast(dt, x + y ~ z, fun=funs, value.var=vars)

R version 3.5.0 (2018-04-23)
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
Running under: Windows 7 x64 (build 7601) Service Pack 1
Matrix products: default

locale:
[1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252
[3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252 LC_NUMERIC=C
[5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252

attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base

other attached packages:
[1] testthat_2.0.0 data.table_1.11.4

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] compiler_3.5.0 magrittr_1.5 R6_2.2.2 tools_3.5.0 rlang_0.2.1

@MarkusBonsch MarkusBonsch added the bug label Aug 17, 2018
@MarkusBonsch
Copy link
Contributor

@MarkusBonsch MarkusBonsch commented Aug 17, 2018

Very strange. I figured it appears if fun is a predefined list, not so much on value.var.
Unfortunately rather low priority at the moment since there are bigger issues.

@arunsrinivasan
Copy link
Member

@arunsrinivasan arunsrinivasan commented Feb 9, 2019

Also acknowledge #1974 when done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.