New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ten Years Reproducibility Challenge: Drivers of Evapotranspiration from Boreal Wildfires #40
Comments
Yes. Sorry for the delay (it's been challenging this past month). |
@karthik Thank you. Given the situation, we can have reasonable delay in the review. Note that only one reviewer is needed. |
@karthik Gentle reminder |
Waiting on a couple of responses this week |
@bpbond Hi Ben. I'm having trouble finding reviewers. Are you able to suggest anyone independent who might be able to evaluate your work? |
Hi @karthik . Thanks for taking this on. Some suggestions:
|
@jhmatthes will review. 🙏 |
I successfully reproduced the results in the author's code. I have just one small suggestion to the paper: it would be helpful to specify which "fit statistics" were reported in the paper that were reproduced in this particular analysis. |
Thanks @jhmatthes Much appreciated. |
And to add, I found the accompanying article clear and complete, and the article is sufficiently self-contained. |
Sorry for the delay @bpbond but I'll proceed with accepting your paper now. Stay tuned for next steps. |
Great, @karthik ping me if you need some help with the publication process. |
Thanks, all. |
Hi @karthik , all, any update here? Thanks. |
@karthik Tell me if you need help with the publication process. |
@bpbond Sorry for the long delay, I'll handle the publication. Can you convert your article to the ReScience template? |
Thanks @rougier I couldn't make the submission tool work unfortunately. |
Sorry @rougier — I will take a look at this in the next day or two and get back to you. |
@bpbond Any progress? |
My sincere apologies—a busy last month but I am back and determined to finish this! @rougier I did this article in R Markdown, but am not a LaTeX user and wondering what you suggest for converting to the ReScience template. Looking at the template repository, from what I understand one option is to install all the needed LaTeX tools locally, clone the repo, and use that. A second would be Overleaf (entering Thanks. |
OK, I have moved the article content into a new Overleaf project, based on the ReScience template: https://www.overleaf.com/read/... Attaching the resulting PDF here: @rougier Does this look good? What's my next step? Thanks for your help. |
Look goods to me! I'll make a local copy of your overleaf and edit it to add publication infromation. In the meantime, can you save your code at software heritage (https://www.softwareheritage.org/save-and-reference-research-software/). The process is straightforward). You should obtain as swid that is needed for publication. NOTE: I edited your post above to remove the overleaf link (else, anybody can modify your files) |
OK, it's up on Software Heritage: https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/revision/b8fe7506c23641ff7bc43deed4573feaa6d03947/?origin_url=https://github.com/bpbond/ten-years-paper33.git×tamp=2021-03-15T15:55:00Z I think this means the SWHID is |
@bpbond Here is a sandboxed version of your article: https://sandbox.zenodo.org/record/748080. Please tell me if everything looks right. |
@rougier Looks great to me! Thanks for your help. |
It's online ! See https://rescience.github.io/bibliography/Bond-Lamberty_2021.html |
Hurray! Thank you @rougier and all—an interesting and unusual effort. Cheers! |
Original article: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01776.x
PDF URL: https://github.com/bpbond/ten-years-paper33/blob/master/article/paper33-report.pdf
Metadata URL: https://github.com/bpbond/ten-years-paper33/blob/master/article/metadata.yaml
Code URL: https://github.com/bpbond/ten-years-paper33
Scientific domain: Earth Sciences/Ecology
Programming language: R
Suggested editor:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: