Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
GitHub is where the world builds software
Millions of developers and companies build, ship, and maintain their software on GitHub — the largest and most advanced development platform in the world.
[RxCocoa] Move from `rx_` prefix to a `rx.` proxy (for Swift 3 update ?) #826
Hi @jegnux ,
I would really like to see this implemented.
As far as for memory management, it seems to me that it would be easier to accidentally cause a strong reference to extended object, but even in that case, strong reference shouldn't cause a leak in case dispose bag is used.
Maybe it would be a good idea to name
My brain just replaces the word "reactive" in programming context with callback, so I'm little confused when reading it :) I'm aware of reactive manifesto, but even for people who have read it, I don't think the word itself brings any clarity in this context :) Also, there are extensions that aren't observable sequences, so that might also be a reason against. I'm also curious about other suggestions. I guess if people like
Maybe it would also be good idea to rename