Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
[RxCocoa] Move from `rx_` prefix to a `rx.` proxy (for Swift 3 update ?) #826
Hi @jegnux ,
I would really like to see this implemented.
As far as for memory management, it seems to me that it would be easier to accidentally cause a strong reference to extended object, but even in that case, strong reference shouldn't cause a leak in case dispose bag is used.
Maybe it would be a good idea to name
My brain just replaces the word "reactive" in programming context with callback, so I'm little confused when reading it :) I'm aware of reactive manifesto, but even for people who have read it, I don't think the word itself brings any clarity in this context :) Also, there are extensions that aren't observable sequences, so that might also be a reason against. I'm also curious about other suggestions. I guess if people like
Maybe it would also be good idea to rename