Regression: conditional substitution [[ ]] is broken

[macdeport]

This appears between version 3.12pre30 and 3.12pre43 at least with %cc(name,bracketMail())%

[RealRaven2000]

Sorry can you be more detailed in your error description.

What exactly is the line you use, what does it do and what do you expect? Also do you use it on a reply email, forward or new? Conditionals that contain address parts cannot be used in "write new" case because all conditional removals have to happen when the editor loads. Also, what version of Thunderbird are you using - I am currently testing with Thunderbird 102.0b4 - the new ESR will be released at the end of this month!

[macdeport]

Thunderbird 78.14.0

Here is my quote header in reply tab:

On %X:=sent%%dateformat(d/m/Y H:M:S)% %from(name,bracketMail())% wrote:<br>
> To: %to(name,bracketMail())%[[
> Cc: %cc(name,bracketMail())%]]
> Subject: %subject%
> Message-ID: %Message-ID%
[[> Reply-to: %reply-to(bracketMail())%
]]>

You are welcome

[RealRaven2000]

Thunderbird 78.14.0

Here is my quote header in reply tab:

On %X:=sent%%dateformat(d/m/Y H:M:S)% %from(name,bracketMail())% wrote:<br>
> To: %to(name,bracketMail())%[[
> Cc: %cc(name,bracketMail())%]]
> Subject: %subject%
> Message-ID: %Message-ID%
[[> Reply-to: %reply-to(bracketMail())%
]]>

You are welcome

I am just testing that how - this is what I get when I paste this quote header - I assume you have "use HTML" switched off:

It's actually better to export your settings (this will include quote header and your template) so I don't have to guess them:

There is probably a way to do what you want to do using the script tags: %{% and %}%, I will write some tests for that next.

[RealRaven2000]

I tried writing some test script using the JavaScript feature (which is documented here ) but unfortunately there is no safe way to include the variable "reply-to" (because JavaScript sees the "-" as a minus and then assumes there are 2 variables "reply" and "to") - it probably needs some deep patching to work. So I think with the current functions it may sadly not be possible to conditionally leave out the reply-to (if it is set by the original sender).

I will do some more tests...

[macdeport]

It's actually better to export your settings (this will include quote header and your template) so I don't have to guess them

Of course: I have just sent to you the JSON configuration.

[macdeport]

You have reproduced the wrong and annoying behaviour of conditional display of Cc:

[macdeport]

When I reply to your mail Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:10:10 +0100 SmartTemplate 3.12.pre30 generates:

while the last SmartTemplate 3.12.pre74 generates:

[RealRaven2000]

while the last SmartTemplate 3.12.pre74 generates:

At first I could not reproduce this with Thunderbird 91.10 and Thunderbird 102.0b8 - cc is left out if it is not set as a mail header.

Here is a test quote header is used myself:

<br> 
<style type="text/css"> 
#newHeaderBruxane { 
  background-color:rgba(210,210,210,0.15);
  border:1px rgb(210,210,210) solid;
  box-shadow: 4px 4px 1px rgba(50,50,50,0.15);
  border-radius:3px;
  display:inline-block;
  font-size: x-small;
  padding:0.8em;
} 
#newHeaderBruxane b {  
  color: #990033;
  display: inline-block; 
  font-weight:bold; 
  min-width: 5em; 
  max-width:none; 
}                
</style>
<div id="newHeaderBruxane">
<b>Betreff:</b> %subject% <br>
<b>An:</b> %to%  <br>
<b>Von:</b> %from%  <br>
[[<b>CC:</b> %cc(name)%  <br>]]
<b>Datum:   </b>%X:=sent%%A%, %dateshort% %H%:%M%
</div>

I believe it is the evil function "replace line breaks with <br>" there is something wrong. I think replacing [[ ]] parts only works if there is an explicit line break <br> in the line containing it.
I had thought about removing this antifeature for a long time, and just mandating the user to add <br> where he wants new lines. Can you try replacing your quote header with the following:

On %X:=sent%%dateformat(d/m/Y H:M:S)% %from(name,bracketMail())% wrote:<br>
> To: %to(name,bracketMail())%[[<br>
> Cc: %cc(name,bracketMail())%]]<br>
> Subject: %subject%<br>
> Message-ID: %Message-ID%<br>
[[> Reply-to: %reply-to(bracketMail())%<br>
]]>

[RealRaven2000]

Another workaround: if you must use "Replace line breaks with <br>, leave out the empty parentheses after bracketMail:

On %X:=sent%%dateformat(d/m/Y H:M:S)% %from(name,bracketMail())% wrote:<br>
> To: %to(name,bracketMail)%[[<br>
> Cc: %cc(name,bracketMail)%]]<br>
> Subject: %subject%<br>
> Message-ID: %Message-ID%<br>
[[> Reply-to: %reply-to(bracketMail)%<br>
]]>

the replacement algorithm has trouble with parsing out the nested (...())

Since you are not using an argument such as bracketMail(square) you don't even need the round brackets.
Another alternative is using bracketMail{} - I am replacing the inner round brackets with the curly brackets at some stage in the algorithm and I found it doesn't disrupt the function the simplifies and boils down address parameters to their fundamental function:

generalFunction = strInBrackets.replace(/%([\w-:=]+)(\([^)]+\))*%/gm, classifyReservedWord);

When it works: "> Cc: %cc(name,bracketMail{})%<br>" ==> "> Cc: <br>"
it can be safely removed by the simplify() function

[RealRaven2000]

The root of the problem is a replacement routine that for some reason only captures the last occurence of the bracketMail() pattern - here is an output from console:

msg
"<br>On %X:=sent%%dateformat(d/m/Y H:M:S)% %from(name,bracketMail())% wrote:<br>> To: %to(name,bracketMail())%<br>[[> Cc: %cc(name,bracketMail())%<br>]]> Subject: %subject%<br>> Message-ID: %Message-ID%<br>[[> Reply-to: %reply-to(bracketMail())%<br>]]>"
msg.replaceAll(/%(.*)(bracketMail\(([^)]*))\)/g, "%$1bracketMail\{$3\}")
"<br>On %X:=sent%%dateformat(d/m/Y H:M:S)% %from(name,bracketMail())% wrote:<br>> To: %to(name,bracketMail())%<br>[[> Cc: %cc(name,bracketMail())%<br>]]> Subject: %subject%<br>> Message-ID: %Message-ID%<br>[[> Reply-to: %reply-to(bracketMail{})%<br>]]>" 

the second string only shows the last, "reply-to(bracketMail{})" processed. I did substitute the function replace() with replaceAll() with no success.

[RealRaven2000]

I found a better regular expression for finding the bracketMail() / bracketName() parts within a %function( )% parameter group that was less greedy than %(.*). Instead I am now using %([a-zA-Z][^)]+) which is a lot more specific. Basically a % function, must start with a letter and cannot include a closing ). This prevents including all following instances and breaks the matches up into 3 singles.

Test:

"<br>To: %to(name,bracketMail())%<br>[[> Cc: %cc(name,bracketMail())%<br>]]><br>[[> Reply-to: %reply-to(bracketMail())%<br>]]>"
.replaceAll(/%([a-zA-Z][^)]+)(bracketMail\(([^)]*))\)/gm, "%$1bracketMail\{$3\}")

"<br>To: %to(name,bracketMail{})%<br>[[> Cc: %cc(name,bracketMail{})%<br>]]><br>[[> Reply-to: %reply-to(bracketMail{})%<br>]]>"

Patched version:
smartTemplate-fx-3.12pre77.zip