You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was looking into efficiently calculating a sum of squares and found the xLASSQauxiliary routines, which do not seem to be exposed in the C-interface. I was wondering what the reason for that was? Is there some C header where these functions might be defined?
This issue came up for the LAPACK rust library, which is closely following lapacke.h to implement its interface.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, having xLASSQ in LAPACKE is definitely a good idea. We will see what we can do. We just got a similar request last week actually from PLASMA. Thanks for the request. Great idea. Best wishes, Julien.
I was looking into efficiently calculating a sum of squares and found the
xLASSQ
auxiliary routines, which do not seem to be exposed in the C-interface. I was wondering what the reason for that was? Is there some C header where these functions might be defined?This issue came up for the
LAPACK
rust library, which is closely followinglapacke.h
to implement its interface.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: