You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Suppose SCCP stack is configured with multiple rsp and SCCP Rule1 configured to use PC1 as primary and PC2 as secondary. Now if message received from PC2 and consumed by SCCP-User and replies back, the GT matches for Rule1, it will use PC1 for out going message instead of PC2.
We need to make a discussion firstly how it is better to achieve this task
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi
I think this is a normal behaviour in the network. The M3UA layer is transaction agnostic and hence pointcodes/addresses should be decided based on SCCP rules (loadsharing/dominant/solitary).
This can be an issue only when the services like USSD/SMSCs are not behind STPs which means that users need to rethink their network implementation.
Suppose SCCP stack is configured with multiple rsp and SCCP Rule1 configured to use PC1 as primary and PC2 as secondary. Now if message received from PC2 and consumed by SCCP-User and replies back, the GT matches for Rule1, it will use PC1 for out going message instead of PC2.
We need to make a discussion firstly how it is better to achieve this task
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: