-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 752
Add solution for Challenge 2 by elecycele #794
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add solution for Challenge 2 by elecycele #794
Conversation
WalkthroughAdds a Go solution for Challenge 2 with a Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant main
participant ReverseString
participant stdout
main->>main: ReadLine from stdin
main->>ReverseString: Call ReverseString(line)
ReverseString->>ReverseString: Convert string to runes
ReverseString->>ReverseString: Swap runes in-place (i ↔ j)
ReverseString-->>main: Return reversed string
main->>stdout: Print result
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
challenge-2/submissions/elecycele/solution-template.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
challenge-2/submissions/elecycele/solution-template.go (1)
1-7: LGTM!Package declaration and imports are appropriate for the task.
| func main() { | ||
| // Read input from standard input | ||
| scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin) | ||
| if scanner.Scan() { | ||
| input := scanner.Text() | ||
|
|
||
| // Call the ReverseString function | ||
| output := ReverseString(input) | ||
|
|
||
| // Print the result | ||
| fmt.Println(output) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding error handling for scanner.
The code doesn't check for scanner errors after Scan() returns. While this works for valid input, it silently ignores any I/O errors.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
func main() {
// Read input from standard input
scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin)
if scanner.Scan() {
input := scanner.Text()
// Call the ReverseString function
output := ReverseString(input)
// Print the result
fmt.Println(output)
}
+ if err := scanner.Err(); err != nil {
+ fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Error reading input: %v\n", err)
+ os.Exit(1)
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func main() { | |
| // Read input from standard input | |
| scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin) | |
| if scanner.Scan() { | |
| input := scanner.Text() | |
| // Call the ReverseString function | |
| output := ReverseString(input) | |
| // Print the result | |
| fmt.Println(output) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| func main() { | |
| // Read input from standard input | |
| scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin) | |
| if scanner.Scan() { | |
| input := scanner.Text() | |
| // Call the ReverseString function | |
| output := ReverseString(input) | |
| // Print the result | |
| fmt.Println(output) | |
| } | |
| if err := scanner.Err(); err != nil { | |
| fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Error reading input: %v\n", err) | |
| os.Exit(1) | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In challenge-2/submissions/elecycele/solution-template.go around lines 9 to 21,
the main function calls scanner.Scan() but does not check scanner.Err()
afterwards so I/O errors are silently ignored; after Scan() returns (and
before/after using input) call scanner.Err(), and if non-nil log or print the
error to stderr (e.g., fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr,...)) and exit with a non-zero
status (os.Exit(1)) so the program fails fast on I/O errors instead of silently
continuing.
|
|
||
| // ReverseString returns the reversed string of s. | ||
| func ReverseString(s string) string { | ||
| // TODO: Implement the function |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove the TODO comment.
The function is fully implemented, so the TODO comment should be removed.
Apply this diff:
- // TODO: Implement the function
runes := []rune(s)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // TODO: Implement the function | |
| runes := []rune(s) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In challenge-2/submissions/elecycele/solution-template.go around line 25, remove
the remaining "// TODO: Implement the function" comment because the function is
already implemented; simply delete that single-line TODO comment so the code no
longer contains stale task markers.
| // TODO: Implement the function | ||
| runes := []rune(s) | ||
| i := 0 | ||
| j := len(s) -1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical bug: Use len(runes) instead of len(s).
Line 28 uses len(s) which returns the byte length of the string, not the rune count. For multi-byte UTF-8 characters, this will cause an index out of bounds panic.
Example: The string "你好" has 6 bytes but only 2 runes. Using j := len(s) - 1 sets j = 5, but runes only has indices 0-1, causing a panic when accessing runes[5].
Apply this diff to fix the bug:
- j := len(s) -1
+ j := len(runes) - 1📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| j := len(s) -1 | |
| j := len(runes) - 1 |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In challenge-2/submissions/elecycele/solution-template.go around line 28, the
code sets j := len(s) - 1 which uses byte length of the string and can panic for
multi-byte UTF-8 characters; change j to use the rune slice length (j :=
len(runes) - 1) so indexing matches the runes slice, ensuring all subsequent
accesses use rune indices rather than byte indices.
Challenge 2 Solution
Submitted by: @elecycele
Challenge: Challenge 2
Description
This PR contains my solution for Challenge 2.
Changes
challenge-2/submissions/elecycele/solution-template.goTesting
Thank you for reviewing my submission! 🚀