Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using the Apache 2.0 license #178

Closed
ohadschn opened this issue Aug 20, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Consider using the Apache 2.0 license #178

ohadschn opened this issue Aug 20, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@ohadschn
Copy link

@ohadschn ohadschn commented Aug 20, 2016

Any reason for the MS-PL license? It's a bit harder to understand and make sure you're compliant with than similar alternatives. For example: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/85301/understanding-the-microsoft-public-license-ms-pl.

Apache 2.0 is one of those licenses you know you can just use basically however you want without worrying about it too much, and as far as I understand it protects the authors just as well.

@ohadschn ohadschn changed the title Use the Apache 2.0 license Consider using the Apache 2.0 license Aug 20, 2016
@RicoSuter
Copy link
Owner

@RicoSuter RicoSuter commented Nov 18, 2016

I'm thinking about switching to an MIT license..

@ohadschn
Copy link
Author

@ohadschn ohadschn commented Nov 19, 2016

Even better!

@RicoSuter RicoSuter closed this in 6798a34 Nov 30, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants