Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Need Consistency in when and where we display Raster Surface Properties #232
In GCD 7, @philipbaileynar added a nice feature of showing the statistics and basic properties of all raster surfaces. I would love to see the grid control broken into:
This information is really helpful for troubleshooting. Essentially, any raster that shows up in the GCD (at least the inputs... thought outputs described in #231 would be nice too), we have a new grid control that shows off this data.
The problem is we are inconsistent in which forms have been updated to show this information:
The Haves (that elitist 1%)
Error Surfaces Added instead of Derived
Reference Error Surfaces
The Have Nots (the rest of us poor sods)
Error Surfaces Derived
The error surfaces derived desprately need a grid control (instead of the input dialog) showing us what kind of error analysis was done, and in case of FIS allowing us to open up the FIS xml:
I think 'Added Reference Surfaces' also fail.
This was referenced
Apr 17, 2018
Super nice @philipbaileynar. I like it. I even like how you did the error surface and multi-method error surfaces! I love how you did this in DoDs→Analysis Details. Really slick. The read only part makes sense. I presume you'll add those little bugs you saw on Intermediates and that one label (or maybe you already fixed those)? Nice work.