Skip to content

Conversation

@beverlylytle
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #74

What type of change is this?

  • Bug fix in a backwards-compatible manner.
  • New feature in a backwards-compatible manner.
  • Breaking change: bug fix or new feature that involve incompatible API changes.
  • Other (e.g. doc update, configuration, etc)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I added a line to the CHANGELOG.rst file in the Unreleased section under the most fitting heading (e.g. Added, Changed, Removed).
  • I ran all tests on my computer and it's all green (i.e. invoke test).
  • I ran lint on my computer and there are no errors (i.e. invoke check).
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

@beverlylytle beverlylytle marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2021 09:52
Copy link
Collaborator

@gonzalocasas gonzalocasas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

I am uncertain if -eventually- we should not just refer to ROS instead of roscore actually. It would fit the updated strings as well, and it might be even less confusing for users (potentially also correct for ROS2).

@beverlylytle
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am uncertain if -eventually- we should not just refer to ROS instead of roscore actually. It would fit the updated strings as well, and it might be even less confusing for users (potentially also correct for ROS2).

Ah, good point. Referring to ROS does make more sense for the docstrings and the logger info. Will change.

@gonzalocasas
Copy link
Collaborator

:shipit: 👍 🚀

@beverlylytle beverlylytle merged commit d5a704b into main Feb 2, 2021
@beverlylytle beverlylytle deleted the neutral_lang branch February 2, 2021 10:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Neutral language refactoring

3 participants