IrcLog2008 10 01

William Deegan edited this page Jan 14, 2016 · 2 revisions
16:50:28  *      garyo-home (n=[chatzill@209-6-158-38.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com](mailto:chatzill@209-6-158-38.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com)) has joined #scons 
17:58:21  *      stevenknight (n=[stevenkn@69.36.227.130](mailto:stevenkn@69.36.227.130)) has joined #scons 
17:58:47  <stevenknight> hey all 
17:59:09  <garyo-home>   Hi Steven; I' 
17:59:11  <garyo-home>   m here 
17:59:40  <garyo-home>   I've been working on a SCons talk for end of next week.  I'll share it when I'm done. 
17:59:48  <stevenknight> cool 
18:00:08  <stevenknight> i've got slides from about three talks that i need to make public 
18:00:18  <stevenknight> iirc you asked me for some awhile back and i never got back to you... :-( 
18:00:26  <garyo-home>   true... 
18:00:51  <garyo-home>   if you have any you'd like to send my way feel free, though at this point i think I have enough (about 26 slides for an hour talk) 
18:00:56  *      [GregNoel](GregNoel) is no longer marked as being away 
18:01:11  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Hi, I'm here... 
18:01:16  <garyo-home>   Hi, Greg. 
18:01:21  <stevenknight> hi greg 
18:01:26  <stevenknight> garyo:  what's the audience? 
18:02:02  <garyo-home>   about 20 people, small company developers.  It's a group of companies under the same investor umbrella. 
18:02:17  <stevenknight> actually, we should probably start, i'm on the shuttle but only for ~30 more minutes 
18:02:26  <stevenknight> garyo-home:  so kind of a general intro? 
18:02:27  <garyo-home>   ok I'm ready. 
18:02:39  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     2201 
18:02:46  <garyo-home>   yes, intro but technical.  Focus on cross-platform.  Yes, 2201. 
18:03:12  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Steven says invalid, but I don't know his reasons. 
18:03:00  <stevenknight> 2201:  consensus invalid?  jean can re-open if he comes up with a case 
18:03:18  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     ah 
18:03:12  <garyo-home>   yes. 
18:03:22  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     ok, done 
18:03:32  <stevenknight> i was going from your comment, actually 
18:03:34  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     2217: Gary, how does one 'wrap things up with subprocess' when it's a Python action?  External commands can use subprocess, I expect, but I don't see how to do it with a Python action. 
18:03:37  <stevenknight> 2217:  consensus wontfix 
18:04:14  <garyo-home>   2217: right, subproc would only work to fork external actions.  No way to multiprocess pure python. 
18:04:23  <garyo-home>   Especially with chdir! 
18:04:04  <stevenknight> i think you could do it by forking a process for each worker thread 
18:04:25  <stevenknight> and sending some indication to "execute this python action" 
18:04:35  <stevenknight> but it would be really hairy to work out the details 
18:04:37  <stevenknight> and not worth it 
18:04:41  <garyo-home>   right, not worth it! 
18:04:47  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     concur 
18:04:48  <stevenknight> agree re: especially chdir 
18:04:51  <stevenknight> okay, done 
18:05:00  <garyo-home>   2219, I did it 
18:05:04  <stevenknight> 2219:  garyo++ 
18:05:11  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     ditto 
18:05:14  <garyo-home>   thx 
18:05:21  <garyo-home>   too cool to pass up 
18:05:21  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     2220 
18:05:21  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Gary, unfortunately, Repository() won't map subdirectories; it only maps some directory to the top of the build.  And I'm pretty sure it's not working as designed; it certainly surprised me. 
18:05:21  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Steven, maybe I have a convert's fervor, but you did such a good job of convincing me, that I don't believe that Repository() is sufficient for all cases.  The case of a variant in a repository is the killer; the search order is context-dependent. 
18:05:21  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     (If you want to propose some new mechanism, I'll be happy to shoot holes in it... {;-}) 
18:05:21  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     It's easy enough to characterize what happened: add a source/foo.c and try to build it as Object('generate/foo.c').  SCons removes it before trying to build it.  That is, SCons is treating it like a target, even though there's no source in the 'include' directory. 
18:05:21  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     I can add the failing SConstruct to the issue or create a new issue if you want. 
18:05:25  <garyo-home>   2220? 
18:06:06  <stevenknight> Greg:  cool, please add th failing SConstruct 
18:06:10  <stevenknight> let me research 
18:06:23  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     OK, research, Steven? 
18:06:25  <garyo-home>   sounds like consensus to me 
18:06:41  <stevenknight> the approach we've had success with on the Chromium (a.k.a. Google Chrome) build is to use addRepository() (internal method) 
18:07:06  <stevenknight> to hook up "source" directories to arbitrary build directories 
18:06:54  <garyo-home>   Chrome is using scons? 
18:07:05  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Why else would they hire him? {;-} 
18:07:17  <stevenknight> yes, Chrome is using SCons 
18:07:28  <stevenknight> although the current release version is still pure Visual Studio 
18:07:25  <garyo-home>   can I say that in my talk? 
18:07:47  <stevenknight> yes, it's public knowledge (it's even in wikipedia!) 
18:07:59  <stevenknight> (and they wouldn't let them put it there if it weren't true!) 
18:08:08  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     suuuuuure 
18:08:11  <garyo-home>   :-/ 
18:08:24  <stevenknight> Google Earth is also built with SCons 
18:08:31  <garyo-home>   nice! 
18:08:44  <garyo-home>   ok, 2221? 
18:08:55  <stevenknight> pretty much all Google client-side apps are or will be SCons 
18:09:08  <stevenknight> ("client-side" == Google for "runs on the user's system, not on a server") 
18:09:15  <garyo-home>   yup, I got that. 
18:09:24  <stevenknight> it threw me when i got here 
18:09:19  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     2221, I see 2145 is already assigned to Steven for research; shall I assume that both of them should be set to 1.2 p3?  (It would clear off one of your pending research issues, Steven...) 
18:09:25  <stevenknight> anyway 
18:09:33  <stevenknight> yes, 1.2 p3 
18:09:44  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     ok, done 
18:10:06  <stevenknight> 2222: 
18:10:17  <garyo-home>   2222: mark me as cc and I'll watch it. 
18:10:25  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     done 
18:10:35  <stevenknight> done 
18:10:39  <garyo-home>   (I'll have to make sure my issue query finds issues w/ me as cc...) 
18:11:14  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     If it doesn't, the [BugSchedule](BugSchedule) query does. 
18:11:18  <garyo-home>   2223: seems like David was working on this on the ML.  Side effects might be the way to go? 
18:11:32  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     2223, consensus David, but when? 
18:11:23  <stevenknight> 2223:  2.x, p2, david? 
18:11:34  <garyo-home>   I'm fine w/ that. 
18:11:41  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     done 
18:11:43  <garyo-home>   2.x p2 fine w/ me 
18:12:04  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     2224 
18:12:09  <stevenknight> 2224:  1.2 p2 david 
18:12:11  <garyo-home>   2224: grr I need to get my buildbot vm up.  I'll try vs_revamp on another windows machine soon. 
18:12:22  <garyo-home>   yes, 1.2 p2 david. 
18:12:27  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     done 
18:12:42  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     And that's the current spreadsheet! 
18:12:24  <stevenknight> you'll probably run into the problems i had 
18:12:32  <stevenknight> and the reasons he withdrew it from 1.1 
18:12:46  <stevenknight> the other tool modules like mslink still call old code to find and set versions 
18:12:50  <stevenknight> and that gums up his stuff 
18:12:56  <stevenknight> i don't think it'll be too bad to fix 
18:13:11  <garyo-home>   I'll see if I can help, I think it's important. 
18:13:19  <stevenknight> agreed re: important 
18:13:22  <garyo-home>   Just need to get a clean windows box to work on. 
18:13:35  <stevenknight> 1.1 is about to go release candidate, though, hence 1.2 
18:13:42  <stevenknight> (should have RC'ed already...) 
18:13:42  <garyo-home>   yes, that's OK. 
18:13:59  <stevenknight> on to 2005? 
18:14:06  <stevenknight> as in 2005[hq]x? 
18:14:09  <garyo-home>   Too bad about my 1.1 issues... all will get deferred to 1.2. 
18:14:15  <stevenknight> mine too 
18:14:22  <garyo-home>   I can't edit the 2005h2 ssheet, but others are fine. 
18:14:33  <stevenknight> i had editing problems too 
18:14:50  <stevenknight> i was able to edit 2005q1 
18:15:25  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     The "share" toggle wasn't selected, although I've checked on it before; I set it now for sure, so it should be OK 
18:15:36  <garyo-home>   I don't think I can edit any of them, I'll try again now. 
18:15:53  <stevenknight> [GregNoel](GregNoel):  i did get in to 2005h2 shortly before the meeting, thanks 
18:16:03  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     make sure you follow the "edit" link _first_ 
18:17:04  <garyo-home>   well, doesn't work for me yet, but that's OK for now, let's look at a few of them. 
18:17:18  <stevenknight> i have less than 10 minutes (closer to five), since we haven't pre-edited how can we make best use of the time? 
18:17:34  <garyo-home>   we're doing h2, right? 
18:17:39  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     yes 
18:17:42  <stevenknight> 2005h2 yes 
18:17:54  <garyo-home>   I agree w/ you guys on the first 2 
18:18:08  <garyo-home>   1259, 1209 
18:18:15  <stevenknight> okay, 1259:  worksforme done 
18:18:26  <stevenknight> 1209:  dup 324, done 
18:18:35  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Steven, should we move the schedule to Mondays? 
18:18:44  <stevenknight> 1210:  i agree w/research 
18:18:47  <stevenknight> schedule: 
18:18:55  <stevenknight> sorry, i should have weighed in 
18:19:09  <stevenknight> day of the week is less an issue for me than time 
18:19:14  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     1210, but who? 
18:19:29  <stevenknight> i have to get on the shuttle ~17:15-17:30 PDT 
18:19:36  <stevenknight> and off ~18:30-19:00 PDT 
18:19:56  <stevenknight> i've started biking to/from the shuttle, so it's 30 minutes off-line 
18:19:57  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     I meant the release schedule: from Sat to Mon 
18:20:04  <stevenknight> oh! 
18:20:08  <stevenknight> heh 
18:20:15  <stevenknight> yes, Monday for those 
18:20:38  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     OK, I'll update the roadmap page 
18:20:51  <garyo-home>   1210: I think it should be low priority, but research means look into it now.  I vote *not* research but 2.x or something 
18:21:00  <stevenknight> 1210:  i'd rather it be someone else 
18:21:22  <stevenknight> i think it needs some thinking unencumbered by my knowledge of the Dir node code 
18:21:39  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     (We'll have to slip 1.1 by a few days) 
18:21:47  <stevenknight> right re: 1.1 slip 
18:21:59  <stevenknight> 1210:  shall we see if bill can take it? 
18:22:04  <garyo-home>   Probably just look at the dir after each removal, and if dir is empty and under a build dir, remove dir. 
18:22:12  <garyo-home>   (after each FILE removal, sorry) 
18:22:52  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     You'd have to keep track of whether it was both a build dir and a src dir 
18:23:11  <garyo-home>   1210: I don't think it's important enough to assign a resource now.  (And Greg: yes, there are complications.  I'm not voluteering...) 
18:23:19  <stevenknight> right, and since so much dir behavior is implicit, 
18:23:39  <stevenknight> figuring out what is or isn't "build dir" vs. "src dir" has the potential for odd heuristics 
18:23:50  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Since Steven is about to turn into a pumpkin, this is a bad time to be designing. 
18:23:55  <stevenknight> 1210:  2.x, future draft pick 
18:24:01  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     done 
18:24:43  <stevenknight> 1213:  research (decide if it's still a problem) 
18:24:50  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     1213, bypass for today? 
18:24:56  <garyo-home>   Yes, I'll research that one (1213) 
18:24:57  <stevenknight> sure, bypass 
18:25:03  <stevenknight> er, i meant, garyo! 
18:25:04  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     which? 
18:25:09  <stevenknight> 1213 
18:25:15  <stevenknight> 1213 garyo, done 
18:25:16  <garyo-home>   I'll look at it. 
18:25:18  <garyo-home>   quick test. 
18:25:26  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     ok, garyo, research 
18:25:33  <stevenknight> 8:  greg, you want it to see the -include in CCFLAGS and deduce the dependency? 
18:25:59  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     yes 
18:25:56  <stevenknight> there's another issue i just looked at that takes the other approach, 
18:26:04  <stevenknight> adding a *FORCEINCLUDE variable 
18:26:12  <stevenknight> that you set and then it adds the -include flag to the command line 
18:26:19  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     hmmm.... 
18:26:21  <stevenknight> like we do with CPPPATH and -I options e.g. 
18:26:26  <stevenknight> i think that's more "sconsy" 
18:26:37  <garyo-home>   Agree w/ steven 
18:26:50  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Would have to be parsed by [MergeFlags](MergeFlags)()... 
18:27:11  <garyo-home>   I don't like looking at cmd lines to figure out deps 
18:26:57  <stevenknight> okay, fifteen seconds... 
18:27:02  <stevenknight> agreed re: [MergeFlags](MergeFlags)() 
18:27:08  <stevenknight> two weeks from now, I assume 
18:27:14  <stevenknight> for next meeting 
18:27:15  <garyo-home>   ok see you then! 
18:27:16  <stevenknight> later guys... 
18:27:18  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     bye 
18:27:20  *      stevenknight has quit ("Leaving") 
18:27:21  <garyo-home>   bye 
18:27:26  <garyo-home>   well that was short. 
18:27:40  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Yeah, but we cleared the current issues 
18:27:50  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     I guess the meeting time is still a work in progress 
18:27:58  <garyo-home>   Greg, would you like to help me edit the 2006h2 sshet?  Send me a direct invite or something? 
18:28:16  <garyo-home>   Yes, time is a little early for me but we're hoping to get some Euro zone folks maybe? 
18:28:27  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     ok, I'll do that.  I'd really like to figure out why it's failing. 
18:28:44  <garyo-home>   The current issue sheet I never have any trouble with. 
18:29:00  <garyo-home>   But 2006h2 has never worked for me ever. 
18:29:02  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     I know there's a _long_ timeout if you view it and just close the page 
18:29:33  <garyo-home>   Could be it, but I don't think so. 
18:29:42  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     without going through the file->close selection, I mean 
18:30:33  <garyo-home>   Yes, I know.  (Just to be clear I'm talking about 200*5*h2 even though I said '06 above) 
18:31:13  <garyo-home>   Maybe a direct invite will work. 
18:31:28  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     I'll send you an individual invitation and we'll see if that works.  (I wonder if invitations age?  That's from six months ago...) 
18:31:39  <garyo-home>   Could be. 
18:32:00  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     OK, I'll do that 
18:32:09  <garyo-home>   OK, well if we're done for now maybe I'll try to make some progress on a bug or two.  And I'll add that doc line you were asking for :-) 
18:33:05  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     Yes...  Strangely enough, I wanted a rule like he described, and was annoyed that there was no way to do it.  This was a most elegant solution and should be documented. 
18:33:57  <garyo-home>   Will do.  See you on the ML... 
18:34:06  <[GregNoel](GregNoel)>     G'night 
18:34:10  <garyo-home>   bye now 
18:34:15  *      [GregNoel](GregNoel) has been marked as being away 
19:54:41  *      garyo-home has quit ("[ChatZilla](ChatZilla) 0.9.83 [Firefox 3.0.3/2008092417]") 

Clone this wiki locally
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Press h to open a hovercard with more details.