Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DCAT: Distribution - Correction of adms:changetype #45

Open
init-dcat-ap-de opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@init-dcat-ap-de
Copy link

commented Mar 14, 2018

Reason:
adms:changeType does not exist in ADMS vocabulary therefore cannot create a verifiable controlled vocabulary constraint.

@makxdekkers

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Mar 27, 2018

We're looking into this.

@addragan

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Oct 1, 2018

The issue can be closed as it was related to issue SEMICeu/dcat-ap_shacl#5 that was also closed.

@addragan addragan closed this Oct 1, 2018
@jakubklimek

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Nov 21, 2018

@addragan I vote to reopen the issue, as the issue is not resolved. The non existent vocabulary is still referenced from DCAT-AP v1.2, creating confusion. I suggest either removing it from DCAT-AP, creating a different vocabulary for it, or somehow add the vocabulary to ADMS.

@addragan

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jul 23, 2019

The issue was re-opened as the non existent vocabulary is still referenced from DCAT-AP v1.2, creating confusion. Proposal to either removing it from DCAT-AP, creating a different vocabulary for it, or adding the vocabulary to ADMS. Please vote your preferred option.

@addragan addragan reopened this Jul 23, 2019
@NatasaSofou

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Sep 13, 2019

Proposed resolution: the non-existent vocabulary will be removed from DCAT-AP 2.0.
The issue will be closed. It can be reopened in case of proposals for creating a different vocabulary for it or adding the vocabulary to ADMS.

@NatasaSofou

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Sep 24, 2019

This is related to #86 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.