ReqIF 'TOOL-EXTENSIONS' are not loaded.

[vincenpt]

Prerequisites

• I have written a descriptive issue title
• I have verified that I am running the latest version of the ReqIFSharp
• I have searched open and closed issues to ensure it has not already been reported

Description

ReqIF 'TOOL-EXTENSIONS' are not loaded when the rest of the ReqIF file is deserialized.

Some brute force debugging of commenting out chunks of ReqIF.cs showed that commenting out the following lines in the ReqIF.cs file allows Tool-Extensions to load:
https://github.com/RHEAGROUP/reqifsharp/blob/2116a7a3e2ba9e4aaa8e57aa012a3d70eb6d3fa0/ReqIFSharp/ReqIF.cs#L64-L75

Some further debugging into ReqIFContent.cs lead me to the ReadXml function:
https://github.com/RHEAGROUP/reqifsharp/blob/2116a7a3e2ba9e4aaa8e57aa012a3d70eb6d3fa0/ReqIFSharp/ReqIFContent.cs#L139-L141

The while loop appears to be iterating over all remaining XML elements in the file, going outside the scope of the CORE-CONTENT and REQ-IF-CONTENT elements.

Steps to Reproduce

Reference ReqIF file:
ProR_Traceability-Template-v1.0.reqif.zip

Following Nunit test fails for the provided ReqIF file:

var path = "ProR_Traceability-Template-v1.0.reqif";
var deserializer = new ReqIFSharp.ReqIFDeserializer();
var reqif = deserializer.Deserialize(path);

Assert.That(reqif.TheHeader, Is.Not.Empty);
Assert.That(reqif.CoreContent, Is.Not.Empty);

// Note: This is the problem. This SHOULDN'T be empty, but it is.
Assert.That(reqif.ToolExtensions, Is.Not.Empty);

System Configuration

• ReqIFSharp version:
  • ReqIFSharp: v2.0.0
  • Other:
• Environment (Operating system, version and so on): Windows 10
• .NET Framework version: .NET Core 2.1
• Additional information:

[samatstariongroup]

@vincenpt, thanks for reporting the issue, we'll get on it to resolve the issue.

[samatstariongroup]

@vincenpt I've identified the issue and i am working on a solution.

[samatstariongroup]

@vincenpt: I managed to fix the issue and in the mean-time made other improvements; let me know whether release 3.0.0 solves this problem for you as well.

[samatstariongroup]

@vincenpt working on a web based reqif viewer, check it out here: https://viewer.reqifsharp.org/ and let us know what you think!