New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Think about creating Base types at API layer #78

Open
gtback opened this Issue Mar 19, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@gtback
Contributor

gtback commented Mar 19, 2014

Right now, we assume that any ThreatActor, TTP, etc. type is the instance defined in the corresponding schema, not an externally defined type. This makes it impossible to parse other types extended from the corresponding base class, and creates some issues with circular dependencies, etc. It's working for now, but we might need to think about actually implementing the abstract base types in the future.

@gtback gtback added the enhancement label Mar 19, 2014

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment