New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

100% or full width #66

Closed
tsnevillecom opened this Issue May 26, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@tsnevillecom

tsnevillecom commented May 26, 2017

Thanks for opening an issue!

Please select the type of issue you're reporting. For questions.

  • Bug
  • Feature Request
  • Question

Problem Report

Would love a 100% width option. I want my box to start at the full width of the screen.

System Info

Node Version: 6.5.0
Browser: Chrome
OS: macOS 10.12.4

Reproduction

If this is a bug report, please provide a reproduction of the issue by going to
http://www.webpackbin.com/41YFBvekG.
Paste a link here to your working reproduction.

@STRML

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@STRML

STRML May 27, 2017

Owner

You are free to style the resizable box however you like. Use CSS.

Owner

STRML commented May 27, 2017

You are free to style the resizable box however you like. Use CSS.

@STRML STRML closed this May 27, 2017

@tsnevillecom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tsnevillecom

tsnevillecom Jun 1, 2017

I have to provide a width in the component, or I'll get an error "The prop width is marked as required in Resizable, but its value is undefined." Unless you have another idea, I'd like to see an example of what CSS handling this.

tsnevillecom commented Jun 1, 2017

I have to provide a width in the component, or I'll get an error "The prop width is marked as required in Resizable, but its value is undefined." Unless you have another idea, I'd like to see an example of what CSS handling this.

@AlecRust

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@AlecRust

AlecRust commented Oct 3, 2017

More at: #69

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment