Describe the bug
I tried evaluating an instance from a newly extended SWE-bench dataset, nebius/SWE-bench-extra, but encountered an error.
Steps/Code to Reproduce
(SWE-bench) root@cpu01-2050-SWE-bench:~/SWE-bench# python -m swebench.harness.run_evaluation --dataset_name nebius/SWE-bench-extra --predictions_path gold --max_workers 1 --split train --instance_ids 0b01001001__spectree-64 --cache_level
instance --run_id validate-gold
Expected Results
The evaluation should work correctly in the same way as the provided example sympy__sympy-20590.
(SWE-bench) root@cpu01-2050-SWE-bench:~/SWE-bench# python -m swebench.harness.run_evaluation \
--predictions_path gold \
--max_workers 1 \
--instance_ids sympy__sympy-20590 \
--run_id validate-gold
<frozen runpy>:128: RuntimeWarning: 'swebench.harness.run_evaluation' found in sys.modules after import of package 'swebench.harness', but prior to execution of 'swebench.harness.run_evaluation'; this may result in unpredictable behaviour
Using gold predictions - ignoring predictions_path
Running 1 instances...
1 ran successfully, 0 failed: 100%|████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 1/1 [01:50<00:00, 110.53s/it]
All instances run.
Cleaning cached images...
Removed 0 images.
Total instances: 1
Instances submitted: 1
Instances completed: 1
Instances incomplete: 0
Instances resolved: 1
Instances unresolved: 0
Instances with empty patches: 0
Instances with errors: 0
Unstopped containers: 0
Unremoved images: 0
Report written to gold.validate-gold.json
Actual Results
However, an error occurred. It seems that MAP_REPO_VERSION_TO_SPECS does not include the newly extended repository. Does this need to be set manually? Could you provide a detailed practical example?
(SWE-bench) root@cpu01-2050-SWE-bench:~/SWE-bench# python -m swebench.harness.run_evaluation --dataset_name nebius/SWE-bench-extra --predictions_path gold --max_workers 1 --split train --instance_ids 0b01001001__spectree-64 --cache_level
instance --run_id validate-gold
<frozen runpy>:128: RuntimeWarning: 'swebench.harness.run_evaluation' found in sys.modules after import of package 'swebench.harness', but prior to execution of 'swebench.harness.run_evaluation'; this may result in unpredictable behaviour
Using gold predictions - ignoring predictions_path
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<frozen runpy>", line 198, in _run_module_as_main
File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
File "/root/SWE-bench/swebench/harness/run_evaluation.py", line 617, in <module>
main(**vars(args))
File "/root/SWE-bench/swebench/harness/run_evaluation.py", line 512, in main
run_instances(
File "/root/SWE-bench/swebench/harness/run_evaluation.py", line 292, in run_instances
test_specs = list(
^^^^^
File "/root/SWE-bench/swebench/harness/run_evaluation.py", line 294, in <lambda>
lambda instance: make_test_spec(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/root/SWE-bench/swebench/harness/test_spec/test_spec.py", line 197, in make_test_spec
specs = MAP_REPO_VERSION_TO_SPECS[repo][version]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^
KeyError: '0b01001001/spectree'
System Information
Linux, Python 3.12, swebench 3.0.13
Describe the bug
I tried evaluating an instance from a newly extended SWE-bench dataset,
nebius/SWE-bench-extra, but encountered an error.Steps/Code to Reproduce
Expected Results
The evaluation should work correctly in the same way as the provided example
sympy__sympy-20590.Actual Results
However, an error occurred. It seems that
MAP_REPO_VERSION_TO_SPECSdoes not include the newly extended repository. Does this need to be set manually? Could you provide a detailed practical example?System Information
Linux, Python 3.12, swebench 3.0.13