Skip to content

Conversation

@SageGJ
Copy link
Contributor

@SageGJ SageGJ commented Nov 26, 2025

Problem:

It is necessary to switch from using validation rules to specify regex validation to specifying the regex pattern in a column of the data model.

Solution:

A new optional column has been added to the data model and the use of the regex validation rule has been deprecated.

Testing:

Tests have been updated as well as testing data.

Testing also uncovered a new bug causing failing tests, tracked here

@SageGJ SageGJ marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2025 20:57
@SageGJ SageGJ requested a review from a team as a code owner November 26, 2025 20:57
@thomasyu888 thomasyu888 changed the title Synpy 1686 [SYNPY-1686] Suport Pattern column in data model Nov 26, 2025
Copy link
Member

@thomasyu888 thomasyu888 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥 Awesome to see this. @SageGJ I updated the PR title - do adjust as you see fit.

I'll defer to the @linglp for a final review of this.

Copy link
Member

@BryanFauble BryanFauble left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this! The changes look good to me.

@SageGJ SageGJ requested review from andrewelamb and removed request for andrewelamb December 8, 2025 16:46
@SageGJ SageGJ merged commit f0e56ce into develop Dec 8, 2025
21 of 26 checks passed
@SageGJ SageGJ deleted the SYNPY-1686 branch December 8, 2025 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants