Skip to content

Conversation

@avik-pal
Copy link
Member

@avik-pal avik-pal commented Sep 2, 2024

still need to test if this fixes the scimlsensitivity issues.

cc @ChrisRackauckas

@avik-pal
Copy link
Member Author

avik-pal commented Sep 2, 2024

locally verified that this patch fixes our downstream issues

@avik-pal
Copy link
Member Author

avik-pal commented Sep 3, 2024

cc @jonniedie for a review

@avik-pal
Copy link
Member Author

avik-pal commented Sep 8, 2024

@jonniedie bump on this

Copy link
Collaborator

@jonniedie jonniedie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this! Sorry to get to it so late.

@jonniedie jonniedie merged commit fbf6a82 into SciML:main Sep 10, 2024
@avik-pal avik-pal deleted the ap/fix_tracker branch September 10, 2024 14:42
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

I do have to wonder if it could be helpful to move this to SciML or JuliaArrays. You've been responsive so it hasn't turned into an issue, but it does kind of worry me that this has become a pretty crucial piece of the infrastructure but remains one of the only single maintainer packages. The first page of the PR history there is mostly Avik, Vedant, Lilith, Aayush, and Dhariya putting in PRs for SciML maintenance, so it does look like it has entered this phase of continued maintenance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants